JAMDA
Volume 4, Issue 5 , Pages 245-250, September 2003

Hip Protector Compliance: A 13-Month Study on Factors and Cost in a Long-Term Care Facility

  • Jeffrey B. Burl, MD, CMD

      Affiliations

    • Department of Geriatrics, Fallon Clinic, Worcester, Massachusetts
    • Masonic Health Care Systems, Charlton, Massachusetts
    • Corresponding Author InformationAddress correspondence to Jeffrey B. Burl, MD, CMD, Director, Geriatrics, Fallon Clinic, 630 Plantation Street, Worcester, MA 01605.
  • ,
  • James Centola, PT

      Affiliations

    • Department of Rehabilitation Services, Charlton, Massachusetts
  • ,
  • Alice Bonner, APRN-BC

      Affiliations

    • Department of Geriatrics, Fallon Clinic, Worcester, Massachusetts
    • University of Massachusetts Graduate School of Nursing, Worcester, Massachusetts
  • ,
  • Colleen Burque, PTA

      Affiliations

    • Masonic Health Care Systems, Charlton, Massachusetts

Objective

To determine if a high compliance rate for wearing external hip protectors could be achieved and sustained in a long-term care population.

Study Design

A 13-month prospective study of daytime use of external hip protectors in an at-risk long-term care population.

Setting

One hundred-bed not-for-profit long-term care facility.

Participants

Thirty-eight ambulatory residents having at least 1 of 4 risk factors (osteoporosis, recent fall, positive fall screen, previous fracture).

Intervention

The rehabilitation department coordinated an implementation program. Members of the rehabilitation team met with eligible participants, primary caregivers, families, and other support staff for educational instruction and a description of the program. The rehabilitation team assumed overall responsibility for measuring and ordering hip protectors and monitoring compliance.

Results

By the end of the third month, hip protector compliance averaged greater than 90% daily wear. The average number of falls per month in the hip protector group was 3.9 versus 1.3 in nonparticipants. Estimated total indirect staff time was 7.75 hours. The total cost of the study (hip protectors and indirect staff time) was $6300.

Conclusions

High hip protector compliance is both feasible and sustainable in an at-risk long-term care population. Achieving high compliance requires an interdisciplinary approach with one department acting as a champion. The cost of protectors could be a barrier to widespread use. Facilities might be unable to cover the cost until the product is paid for by third-party payers.

Keywords:  hip protectors , compliance , falls , costs and cost analysis , long-term care facilities

To access this article, please choose from the options below

Login to an existing account or Register a new account.

  • Purchase this article for 31.50 USD (You must login/register to purchase this article)

    Online access for 24 hours. The PDF version can be downloaded as your permanent record.

  • Subscribe to this title

    Get unlimited online access to this article and all other articles in this title 24/7 for one year.

  • Claim access now

    For current subscribers with Society Membership or Account Number.

  • Visit SciVerse ScienceDirect to see if you have access via your institution.
 

PII: S1525-8610(04)70367-9

JAMDA
Volume 4, Issue 5 , Pages 245-250, September 2003