JAMDA
Volume 12, Issue 7 , Pages 524-534, September 2011

Work Autonomy of Certified Nursing Assistants in Long-Term Care Facilities: Discrepant Perceptions Between Nursing Supervisors and Certified Nursing Assistants

  • Li-Fan Liu, PhD

      Affiliations

    • Institute of Gerontology, College of Medicine, National Cheng Kung University, Tainan, Taiwan
    • Corresponding Author InformationAddress correspondence to Li-Fan Liu, PhD, Institute of Gerontology, College of Medicine, National Cheng Kung University, No. 1, University Road, Tainan, 704, Taiwan.
  • ,
  • Wei-Pei Liu, MHA

      Affiliations

    • Department of Health Services Administration, China Medical University, Taichung, Taiwan
  • ,
  • Jong-Yi Wang, PhD

      Affiliations

    • Department of Health Services Administration, China Medical University, Taichung, Taiwan

published online 04 October 2010.

Objectives

Despite increasing demand of certified nursing assistants (CNAs) in long-term care (LTC) facilities, their work autonomy delegated by nursing supervisors remains ambiguous and varied. This study investigates the CNAs' role in LTC facilities by examining the degrees of work autonomy of CNAs from the perspectives of nursing supervisors and CNAs. Whether the characteristics of institutions including ownership of facilities, bed size, staffing levels, and the occupancy rate affected the CNAs' work autonomy and delegations was also examined.

Design

A stratified random sampling method was used to sample LTC facilities in Taiwan.

Methods

A self-administered structured questionnaire was answered by a senior nursing supervisor and CNA in each sampled institution for their perception of work autonomy in the 5 main aspects of CNAs' job contents: personal care, affiliated nursing care, auxiliary medical service, social care, and administration services. Student t test and general linear models (GLM) were used to test the mean differences of CNAs' work autonomy and their relationship with the institutions' characteristics.

Results

Nursing supervisors and CNAs both rated the highest scores of work autonomy in the aspect of personal care, and the lowest scores in the aspect of affiliated nursing care. However, the nursing supervisors expected higher work autonomy of CNAs on the work items particularly in affiliated nursing care and auxiliary medical services than did the CNAs (P < .05). The institutional-level factors were significantly associated with perceptions of nursing supervisors toward CNAs' work autonomy. The ownership (hospital-based or freestanding homes), sizes (capacity), occupancy rates, CNA staff numbers of the long-term care facilities, and resident numbers were related to the CNAs' work autonomy as perceived by their nursing supervisors. No difference between the aspects of administration activities and social care was seen.

Conclusions

There are discordance views towards CNAs' work autonomy both in nursing supervisors and CNAs across different settings in LTC institutions. The characteristics of institutions influence perceptions of CNAs' work autonomy as perceived by nursing supervisors. Clear and mandated regulation of CNA job contents is needed for their work identity and autonomy to improve the quality of care in LTC facilities.

Keywords: Role, job contents, work autonomy, delegation, certified nursing assistants

To access this article, please choose from the options below

Login to an existing account or Register a new account.

  • Purchase this article for 31.50 USD (You must login/register to purchase this article)

    Online access for 24 hours. The PDF version can be downloaded as your permanent record.

  • Subscribe to this title

    Get unlimited online access to this article and all other articles in this title 24/7 for one year.

  • Claim access now

    For current subscribers with Society Membership or Account Number.

  • Visit SciVerse ScienceDirect to see if you have access via your institution.
 

 This study was supported by grants from National Science Council, Taiwan, NSC94–2416-H-426–001 and NSC95–2416-H-039–003.

PII: S1525-8610(10)00168-4

doi:10.1016/j.jamda.2010.05.006

JAMDA
Volume 12, Issue 7 , Pages 524-534, September 2011