Interobserver Reliability of Radiologists’ Interpretations of Mobile Chest Radiographs for Nursing Home–Acquired Pneumonia
Objectives
To determine the interobserver reliability of radiologists’ interpretations of mobile chest radiographs for nursing home–acquired pneumonia.
Design
A cross-sectional reliability study.
Setting
Nursing homes and an acute care hospital.
Participants
Four radiologists reviewed 40 mobile chest radiographs obtained from residents of nursing homes who met a clinical definition of lower respiratory tract infections.
Measurements
Radiologists were asked to interpret radiographs with respect to the film quality; presence, pattern, and extent of an infiltrate; and the presence of a pleural effusion or adenopathy. Interrater reliability was evaluated using the intraclass correlation coefficient derived from a 2-way random effects model.
Results
On average the radiologists reported that 6 of the 40 films were of very good or excellent quality and 16 of the 40 were of fair or poor quality. When the finding of an infiltrate was dichotomized (0 = no; 1 = possible, probable, or definite) all 4 radiologists agreed on 21 of the 37 chest radiographs. The intraclass correlation coefficient for the presence or absence of infiltrates was 0.54 (95% confidence intervals [CI] 0.38 to 0.69). For the 14 radiographs where infiltrates were observed by all radiologists, intraclass correlation coefficients for the presence of pleural effusions was 0.08 (95% CI –0.10 to 0.41), hilar adenopathy 0.54 (95% CI 0.29 to 0.79), and mediastinal adenopathy 0.49 (95% CI 0.21 to 0.76).
Conclusion
In conclusion, the interrater agreement among radiologists for mobile chest radiographs in establishing the presence or absence of an infiltrate can be judged to be “fair.” Treatment decisions need to include clinical findings and should not be made based on radiographic findings alone.
Keywords: Reliability , mobile x-rays , pneumonia , nursing home
To access this article, please choose from the options below
This study was supported by an Interdisciplinary Health Research Team grant from the Canadian Institute of Health Research.
PII: S1525-8610(06)00124-1
doi:10.1016/j.jamda.2006.02.004
© 2006 American Medical Directors Association. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
