JAMDA
Volume 7, Issue 9 , Pages 550-555, November 2006

Design Features to Enhance External Hip Protector Adherence in the Nursing Home Setting

  • Lisa A. Honkanen, MD, MA

      Affiliations

    • The Division of Geriatrics and Gerontology, The Joan and Sanford Weill Medical College, Cornell University, New York, NY
    • The Department of Public Health, The Joan and Sanford Weill Medical College, Cornell University, New York, NY.
    • Corresponding Author InformationAddress correspondence to Lisa A. Honkanen, MD, MA, Weill Medical College of Cornell University, 525 E. 68th Street, Box 39, New York, NY 10021.
  • ,
  • Melissa L. Dehner, MSE

      Affiliations

    • The Division of Geriatrics and Gerontology, The Joan and Sanford Weill Medical College, Cornell University, New York, NY
  • ,
  • Mark S. Lachs, MD, MPH

      Affiliations

    • The Division of Geriatrics and Gerontology, The Joan and Sanford Weill Medical College, Cornell University, New York, NY

published online 10 July 2006.

Objective

To determine the preferences for external hip protector (EHP) design features of both certified nursing assistants (CNAs) and nursing home laundry personnel, and to test the durability of favored model features.

Design

Cross-sectional descriptive study of CNAs’ and laundry personnels’ preferences and a prospective experimental study of EHP fastener durability under institutional laundry conditions.

Setting

Three urban nursing homes and a hospital-based laundry service.

Participants

Twenty-seven CNAs, 4 laundry service supervisors.

Intervention

Five focus groups with CNAs and a survey of laundry supervisors were conducted to elicit preferences of EHP design features with an emphasis on convenience and durability. A laundry test of 20 EHPs was conducted to compare these design features.

Results

There was wide agreement among CNAs and laundry personnel that EHPs with soft pads in garments of light neutral colors, and cotton-blend fabrics were most preferred. CNAs preferred sewn-in pads to removeable ones, but laundry personnel had no consensus on this issue. For dependent residents, wraparound (front opening) garments using Velcro were preferred by CNAs, whereas laundry supervisors preferred snap closures. When EHP underwent repeated washing in the laundry test, Velcro and snaps were functionally comparable at 52 cycles. Garments constructed of heavyweight cotton blends, polyester, or cotton with spandex maintained elasticity at 52 weeks, whereas the lightweight cotton blend stretched significantly.

Conclusions

Based on CNAs’ preferences, laundry personnels’ input, and a laundry test, EHP design features that could enhance both caregiver efficiency and resident comfort include soft pads sewn into a light-colored (but non-white) heavier weight cotton-blend garment, with the availability of both a pull-up style and a wraparound style using Velcro fasteners. Snaps did not demonstrate superior durability in the laundry test, but further comparison with Velcro under clinical conditions is indicated. Education and inclusion of CNAs in EHP decision making are important ways to improve EHP adherence.

Keywords: External hip protectors, adherence, certified nursing assistants, nursing home, design

To access this article, please choose from the options below

Login to an existing account or Register a new account.

  • Purchase this article for 31.50 USD (You must login/register to purchase this article)

    Online access for 24 hours. The PDF version can be downloaded as your permanent record.

  • Subscribe to this title

    Get unlimited online access to this article and all other articles in this title 24/7 for one year.

  • Claim access now

    For current subscribers with Society Membership or Account Number.

  • Visit SciVerse ScienceDirect to see if you have access via your institution.
 

 This work was supported by the Mary and David Hoar Grant Program of the New York Community Trust and The New York Academy of Medicine.

PII: S1525-8610(06)00258-1

doi:10.1016/j.jamda.2006.05.005

JAMDA
Volume 7, Issue 9 , Pages 550-555, November 2006