JAMDA
Volume 8, Issue 6 , Pages 388-395, July 2007

Psychometric Properties of the German “Pain Assessment in Advanced Dementia Scale” (PAINAD-G) in Nursing Home Residents

  • Matthias Siegfried Schuler, MD

      Affiliations

    • Diakonie Hospital Mannheim, Germany
    • Corresponding Author InformationAddress correspondence to Dr. Matthias Schuler, Diakonie-Krankenhaus, Feldbergstr. 68-70, 68163 Mannheim, Germany.
  • ,
  • Stefanie Becker, MD

      Affiliations

    • Institute for Gerontology, University of Heidelberg, Germany
  • ,
  • Roman Kaspar

      Affiliations

    • Institute for Gerontology, University of Heidelberg, Germany
  • ,
  • Thorsten Nikolaus, PhD

      Affiliations

    • Bethesda Geriatric Clinic, University of Ulm, Germany
  • ,
  • Andreas Kruse, PhD

      Affiliations

    • Institute for Gerontology, University of Heidelberg, Germany
  • ,
  • Heinz Dieter Basler, PhD

      Affiliations

    • Institute for Medical Psychology, University of Marburg, Germany.

published online 16 June 2007.

Objectives

The study aims to evaluate the psychometric properties of the German version of a scale for the assessment of pain in advanced dementia (PAINAD-G).

Design

Cross-sectional study.

Setting

Eight nursing homes.

Participants

Ninety-nine residents in 8 nursing homes diagnosed with Alzheimer’s disease (68.3%) or other types of dementia (31.7%) participated after informed consent was obtained from their proxies. Nurses in charge of the residents observed their pain behavior over a 2-minute period while performing routine nursing activities—once in the morning and once in the evening.

Measurements

PAINAD-G relies on the observation of 5 behavioral categories indicative of pain: breathing, vocalization, facial expression, body language, and consolability.

Results

Psychometric analyses revealed good internal consistency of the scale (Cronbach’s α = 0.85). Inter-rater stability amounted to r = 0.80 and retest reliability to r = 0.90. Principal component analysis allowed the extraction of one factor that accounted for 63.5% of the cumulative factor variance. Validity data shows that PAINAD-G scores were higher in residents assumed to suffer from pain in comparison to those without pain. On the other hand, the level of pain rating did not correspond with the PAINAD-G scores. Residents rated to suffer from pain showed more pain behavior with increased cognitive deterioration. Measures that indicate nonpain disorders did not correlate with the PAINAD-G scores.

Discussion

PAINAD-G is a 1-dimensional scale that demonstrates good reliability. The outcome supports the assumption that the scale actually measures pain.

Keywords: Pain assessment, dementia, elderly, psychometric properties

To access this article, please choose from the options below

Login to an existing account or Register a new account.

  • Purchase this article for 31.50 USD (You must login/register to purchase this article)

    Online access for 24 hours. The PDF version can be downloaded as your permanent record.

  • Subscribe to this title

    Get unlimited online access to this article and all other articles in this title 24/7 for one year.

  • Claim access now

    For current subscribers with Society Membership or Account Number.

  • Visit SciVerse ScienceDirect to see if you have access via your institution.
 

 This study was supported by a grant provided by Mundipharma, Limburg, Germany. The sponsor did not play a role for all authors in the design, methods, subject recruitment, data collection or analysis, or interpretation of the paper.

PII: S1525-8610(07)00201-0

doi:10.1016/j.jamda.2007.03.002

JAMDA
Volume 8, Issue 6 , Pages 388-395, July 2007