JAMDA
Volume 9, Issue 1 , Pages 29-35, January 2008

Urinary Incontinence: A Neglected Geriatric Syndrome in Nursing Facilities

  • Larry W. Lawhorne, MD

      Affiliations

    • Department of Geriatrics, Boonshoft School of Medicine, Wright State University, Dayton, OH
    • Corresponding Author InformationAddress correspondence to Larry W. Lawhorne, MD, Department of Geriatrics, Boonshoft School of Medicine, Wright State University, 627 Edwin C. Moses Boulevard, Fifth Floor, East Medical Plaza, Dayton, OH 45408.
  • ,
  • Joseph G. Ouslander, MD

      Affiliations

    • Division of Geriatric Medicine and Gerontology, Department of Medicine, Center for Health and Aging, Emory University School of Medicine and the Birmingham/Atlanta VA GRECC, Atlanta, GA
  • ,
  • Patricia A. Parmelee, PhD

      Affiliations

    • Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Science, Emory University School of Medicine and Birmingham/Atlanta VA GRECC, Atlanta, GA
  • ,
  • Barbara Resnick, PhD, CRNP, FAAN, FAANP

      Affiliations

    • University of Maryland School of Nursing, Baltimore, MD
  • ,
  • Barbara Calabrese, RN, BA

      Affiliations

    • American Medical Directors Association Foundation, Columbia, MD.

published online 13 December 2007.

Purpose

Urinary incontinence (UI) is common but inadequately assessed and treated in nursing facility (NF) residents. The purpose of this study is two-fold: (1) to determine perceptions about the importance of UI and its management in the NF setting compared with other geriatric syndromes and (2) to compare barriers to UI care as perceived by physicians, geriatric nurse practitioners (GNPs), directors of nursing and other nurses in administrative positions (DONs), and nursing assistants (NAs).

Methods

Computer-based surveys of physicians and DONs and a hard copy survey of NAs at their national meetings; an online survey of GNPs.

Results

Responses included 395 physicians (31% response rate), 152 DONs (34%), 118 GNPs (23%), and 277 NAs (60%). Physicians, GNPs, and DONs evaluated and managed UI significantly less often than 5 other geriatric syndromes (behavioral symptoms of dementia, falls, unintended weight loss, pain, and delirium). In contrast, NAs were more likely to be involved in UI care than in care provided for residents with any of the other 5 syndromes. All 4 groups agreed that UI has less effect on clinical outcomes than the other 5 syndromes. However, DONs rated UI first with respect to cost of care; NAs third behind falls and pain; and physicians and GNPs rated UI fourth behind falls, behavioral symptoms, and delirium. With respect to quality of life effects, physicians and GNPs rated UI fifth and fourth respectively and DONs fourth. In contrast, NAs rated UI second only to pain with respect to its effect on quality of life. Perceived barriers differ among the 4 groups with physicians relatively more concerned that drug treatment alone is ineffective (P = .002); GNPs relatively more concerned with lack of effective nondrug interventions (P = .001); and DONs relatively more concerned about sufficient time to assess and manage UI (P = .001). NA respondents rated concern about anticholinergic drug effects lower than did respondents in the other 3 groups (P = .001).

Conclusion

Physicians, GNPs, and DONs are more likely to be involved in evaluating and managing behavioral symptoms of dementia, pain, falls, delirium, and unintended weight loss than UI in the NF setting. This leaves NAs as first-line managers for a condition that they perceive to have an important impact on quality of life. Perceived barriers to improving UI care differ among the 4 groups suggesting that approaches to overcoming the barriers should be multi-faceted.

Keywords: Urinary incontinence, geriatric syndromes, nursing facilities

To access this article, please choose from the options below

Login to an existing account or Register a new account.

  • Purchase this article for 31.50 USD (You must login/register to purchase this article)

    Online access for 24 hours. The PDF version can be downloaded as your permanent record.

  • Subscribe to this title

    Get unlimited online access to this article and all other articles in this title 24/7 for one year.

  • Claim access now

    For current subscribers with Society Membership or Account Number.

  • Visit SciVerse ScienceDirect to see if you have access via your institution.
 

 The authors acknowledge members of the AMDA Foundation Research Network and in particular members of the work group on urinary incontinence: Elizabeth Baum (Canton, OH), J. Kenneth Brubaker (Mt. Joy, PA), Colene Byrne (Albany, NY), Khaled Imam (Royal Oak, MI), Kristijan Kahler (Novartis, East Hanover, NJ), Linda Keilman (East Lansing, MI), Betsy Kemeny (Grove City, PA), Janet Lieto (Cherry Hill, NJ), June McKoy (Chicago, IL), and Douglas Scharre (Columbus, OH).

PII: S1525-8610(07)00354-4

doi:10.1016/j.jamda.2007.08.003

JAMDA
Volume 9, Issue 1 , Pages 29-35, January 2008