JAMDA
Volume 9, Issue 5 , Pages 327-331, June 2008

Development of a Scale to Measure Quality of Visits With Relatives With Dementia

  • Ladislav Volicer, MD, PhD

      Affiliations

    • School of Aging Studies, University of South Florida, Tampa, FL
    • Geriatric Research Education Clinical Center, E.N. Rogers Memorial Veterans Hospital,Bedford, MA
    • Department of Psychiatry, Boston University School of Medicine, Boston, MA.
    • Corresponding Author InformationAddress correspondence to: Ladislav Volicer, MD, PhD, University of South Florida, School of Aging Studies, 337 Dekan Lane, Land O'Lakes, FL 34639.
  • ,
  • Laura DeRuvo, BA

      Affiliations

    • School of Aging Studies, University of South Florida, Tampa, FL
  • ,
  • Kathryn Hyer, PhD, MPP

      Affiliations

    • School of Aging Studies, University of South Florida, Tampa, FL
  • ,
  • Joanna Piechniczek-Buczek, MD

      Affiliations

    • Geriatric Research Education Clinical Center, E.N. Rogers Memorial Veterans Hospital,Bedford, MA
    • Department of Psychiatry, Boston University School of Medicine, Boston, MA.
  • ,
  • Mary Ellen Riordan, MSW

      Affiliations

    • Geriatric Research Education Clinical Center, E.N. Rogers Memorial Veterans Hospital,Bedford, MA

published online 01 May 2008.

Objectives

The purpose of this study was to develop a Family Visit Scale for Dementia (FAVS-D) measuring the quality of visits between nursing home residents with dementia and their family members.

Design

Scale development using a two step process based on survey data.

Setting

One Veterans Administration and eleven community nursing homes.

Participants

One hundred and fifteen family members visiting residents with dementia.

Measurements

Responses to a preliminary scale of 41 items, developed from a qualitative study, and responses to a 15 item scale, generated from the preliminary scale by eliminating items that were answered “does not apply” by a significant number of family members and by sequential iterations that removed items with low or high item total correlations or with high item-item correlations. Questionnaires were anonymously completed by family members after visit with a relative with dementia.

Results

Final FAVS-D has 14 item after eliminating 1 question that family members considered confusing. The mean score of FAVS-D was 18.7 + 6.6 (mean + SD) with a range of −10 to 28. After leaving out one outlier value, the distribution of FAVS-D score was not different from normal distribution. Reliability coefficient alpha for FAVS-D was 0.77. The factor analysis produced 4 factors: factor 1 (7 items, ? = .82) related to nursing staff interaction with residents and visitors, factor 2 (4 items, ? = .73) related to meaningfulness of the visit, factor 3 (2 items, ? = .85) related to cleanliness and factor 4 (1 item) related to the connection established between the visitor and the resident. There was a significant difference between total FAVS-D scores of two facilities that provided most of the questionnaires. Subscores for nursing staff and meaningfulness factors in these two facilities were also significantly different, while subscores for cleanliness and connection were similar.

Conclusions

This study indicates that it is possible to measure family visit satisfaction. The most important factors of FAVS-D, are factor 1 related to nursing staff activity and explaining 25% of variance, and factor 2 related to meaningfulness of the visit and explaining 16% of variance. When the facility staff becomes more involved with families of their residents and helps them make visit more meaningful, the families feel more satisfied with the visits.

Keywords: Dementia, visits, scale, quality

To access this article, please choose from the options below

Login to an existing account or Register a new account.

  • Purchase this article for 31.50 USD (You must login/register to purchase this article)

    Online access for 24 hours. The PDF version can be downloaded as your permanent record.

  • Subscribe to this title

    Get unlimited online access to this article and all other articles in this title 24/7 for one year.

  • Claim access now

    For current subscribers with Society Membership or Account Number.

  • Visit SciVerse ScienceDirect to see if you have access via your institution.
 

 The authors have no conflicts of interest regarding this article.

PII: S1525-8610(08)00029-7

doi:10.1016/j.jamda.2008.01.012

JAMDA
Volume 9, Issue 5 , Pages 327-331, June 2008