JAMDA
Volume 10, Issue 2 , Pages 98-106, February 2009

“Sometimes People Don't Fit in Boxes”: Attitudes Toward the Minimum Data Set Among Clinical Leadership in VA Nursing Homes

  • Patricia A. Parmelee, PhD

      Affiliations

    • Atlanta Veterans Affairs Medical Center and Birmingham/Atlanta Geriatric Research, Education and Clinical Center, Decatur, GA
    • Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, Emory University School of Medicine, Atlanta, GA
    • Now at Center for Mental Health and Aging and Department of Psychology, The University of Alabama, Tuscaloosa, AL
    • Corresponding Author InformationAddress correspondence to Patricia A. Parmelee, PhD, Center for Mental Health and Aging, Box 870315, 207 Osband Hall, The University of Alabama, Tuscaloosa, AL 35487-0315
  • ,
  • Susan E. Bowen, PhD

      Affiliations

    • Atlanta Veterans Affairs Medical Center and Birmingham/Atlanta Geriatric Research, Education and Clinical Center, Decatur, GA
  • ,
  • April Ross, MS

      Affiliations

    • Atlanta Veterans Affairs Medical Center and Birmingham/Atlanta Geriatric Research, Education and Clinical Center, Decatur, GA
  • ,
  • Holly Brown, RN, MSN, GNP

      Affiliations

    • Atlanta Veterans Affairs Medical Center and Birmingham/Atlanta Geriatric Research, Education and Clinical Center, Decatur, GA
  • ,
  • Joanna Huff, RN, MSN, GNP

      Affiliations

    • Atlanta Veterans Affairs Medical Center and Birmingham/Atlanta Geriatric Research, Education and Clinical Center, Decatur, GA
    • Now at Park Springs Continuing Care Retirement Community, Stone Mountain, GA

published online 22 December 2008.

Objective

To describe attitudes toward the Minimum Data Set (MDS) among Department of Veterans Affairs (VA) nursing home care unit (NHCU) clinical leadership.

Design

Cross-sectional online survey using structured (quantitative) and open-ended (qualitative) items.

Setting

Approximately 97 VA Medical Center NCHUs nationwide.

Participants

A total of 289 directors of nursing, medical directors, MDS coordinators, nurse managers and other clinical management staff.

Measurements

Quantitative ratings of the MDS's accuracy, usefulness for initial and ongoing care planning, and utility for quality improvement; content analysis of open-ended items describing perceived causes of inaccuracy and reasons for use/nonuse in care planning and quality improvement.

Results

Although quantitative ratings were generally positive, qualitative analysis yielded a number of emergent themes regarding data accuracy, team functioning, timeliness of assessments, and validity of the MDS tool itself. Medical directors were somewhat less positive about the MDS than were other NHCU leadership. Very large and very small facilities were less likely to view the tool as useful and to use it for care planning and quality improvement.

Conclusions

NHCU clinical leadership clearly has a “love-hate” relationship with the MDS. They value information it provides, but identify a number of weaknesses that limit its utility for clinical use.

Keywords: Minimum Data Set, staff attitudes, veterans

To access this article, please choose from the options below

Login to an existing account or Register a new account.

  • Purchase this article for 31.50 USD (You must login/register to purchase this article)

    Online access for 24 hours. The PDF version can be downloaded as your permanent record.

  • Subscribe to this title

    Get unlimited online access to this article and all other articles in this title 24/7 for one year.

  • Claim access now

    For current subscribers with Society Membership or Account Number.

  • Visit SciVerse ScienceDirect to see if you have access via your institution.
 

 The title quote is a comment made by a study participant in response to the question, “In your opinion, what causes [the Minimum Data Set] to be inaccurate?”

 This research was supported by a research grant, IIR-03–241, from the US Department of Veterans Affairs Health Services Research and Development Service to the first author. None of the authors of this research had any conflict of interest.

PII: S1525-8610(08)00270-3

doi:10.1016/j.jamda.2008.08.004

JAMDA
Volume 10, Issue 2 , Pages 98-106, February 2009