Gender Differences and Health Status in Old and Very Old Patients
Objectives
To examine gender differences according to health status, social support, and DRG reimbursement in a population of elderly patients admitted to a hospital geriatric ward in Italy and also to examine the patterns of these differences across old age strata.
Design
Observational study
Participants
A total of 2171 patients, 70 years and older (females = 1088), consecutively admitted for acute care to a geriatric ward in a general hospital during a 30-month period were included. Patients were stratified into 3 age groups: 70 to 79 (n = 1038, females = 521), 80 to 89 (n = 948, females = 476), and 90+ (n = 185, females = 91).
Measurements
Demographics, main reason for hospitalization, Charlson Index, APACHE II score, APACHE II-APS subscore, serum albumin, number of currently administered drugs, cognitive status, depression, functional status, length of stay, Diagnoses Related Group (DRG) weight, in-hospital, and 3-month mortality were recorded. Differences were evaluated according to gender across old age strata.
Results
In the group of 70- to 79-year-old patients, significant differences were found regarding number of comorbidities, biological and clinical markers of clinical severity (ie, serum albumin, APS, delirium), and functional status on admission (ie, the greater impairment was found in male patients, with a higher in-hospital and 3-month mortality). Moreover, females had less social support and more often live alone. DRG weight parallels clinical complexity, whereas length of stay is comparable. Gender differences were less evident in the 80–89 year-old patients and almost absent in those 90+.
Conclusions
Data indicate that on hospital admission gender differences are significant in young old patients, but not in old and very old, suggesting a poor survivorship of males with increasing age.
Keywords: Health status, gender differences, old age
To access this article, please choose from the options below
Authors have no conflicts of interest relating to this article.
PII: S1525-8610(09)00134-0
doi:10.1016/j.jamda.2009.04.005
© 2009 American Medical Directors Association. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
