JAMDA
Volume 10, Issue 7 , Pages 505-510, September 2009

Pain Assessment in Nursing Home Residents With Dementia: Psychometric Properties and Clinical Utility of the CNA Pain Assessment Tool (CPAT)

  • Frank A. Cervo, MD, CMD

      Affiliations

    • Long Island State Veterans Home, Stony Brook, NY
    • Stony Brook University Medical Center, Stony Brook, NY
    • Corresponding Author InformationAddress correspondence to Frank A. Cervo, MD, Long Island State Veterans Home, 100 Patriots Road, Stony Brook, NY 11790.
  • ,
  • Patricia Bruckenthal, PhD, RN, NP-C

      Affiliations

    • Stony Brook University School of Nursing, Stony Brook, NY
  • ,
  • John J. Chen, PhD

      Affiliations

    • Stony Brook University Medical Center, Stony Brook, NY
  • ,
  • Lory E. Bright-Long, MD, CMD

      Affiliations

    • Stony Brook University Medical Center, Stony Brook, NY
    • Maria Regina Residence, Brentwood, NY
  • ,
  • Suzanne Fields, MD, FACP

      Affiliations

    • Stony Brook University Medical Center, Stony Brook, NY
    • Gurwin Jewish Geriatric Nursing and Rehabilitation Center, Commack, NY
  • ,
  • Guangxiang Zhang, MS

      Affiliations

    • Stony Brook University Medical Center, Stony Brook, NY
  • ,
  • Ian Strongwater

      Affiliations

    • Long Island State Veterans Home, Stony Brook, NY

published online 10 August 2009.

Objectives

To examine the psychometric properties and clinical utility of the CPAT, an instrument to assess pain in nursing home residents with dementia.

Design

Instrument development and testing.

Setting

Three regional skilled nursing facilities.

Participants

One hundred forty-five residents of 3 skilled nursing facilities.

Measurements

The inter-rater reliability, test-retest reliability, construct validity, and criterion validity of the CPAT was measured after initial CNA training. Measurement of inter-rater reliability and test-retest reliability was repeated after modified CNA training. Internal consistency (Cronbach's alpha) was calculated for all reliability measures. The clinical utility/feasibility of the CPAT was measured by means of a practicality survey.

Results

The CPAT was found to have acceptable levels of both interrater reliability (ICC=0.71) and test-retest reliability (ICC=0.67). Construct validity as measured by a paired t test was statistically significant (P=.043). Criterion validity as measured by Spearman's rank correlation coefficient was also statistically significant (P=.048). Internal consistency was acceptable for all measures as calculated by Cronbach's alpha, which ranged from 0.72 to 0.84. As determined by a practicality survey, the CPAT was shown to be a clinically useful and feasible instrument.

Conclusion

This study provides evidence that the CPAT is a reliable and valid pain assessment instrument when used in nursing home residents with dementia. It has also been shown to be a tool with suitable clinical utility and feasibility. Further study is warranted to ascertain if its use will lead to improved resident function and quality of life and whether the results of this study are reproducible in other dementia populations. The CPAT's ability to quantify pain and measure treatment response has not been determined.

Keywords: Pain assessment, dementia, nursing home, psychometric properties

To access this article, please choose from the options below

Login to an existing account or Register a new account.

  • Purchase this article for 31.50 USD (You must login/register to purchase this article)

    Online access for 24 hours. The PDF version can be downloaded as your permanent record.

  • Subscribe to this title

    Get unlimited online access to this article and all other articles in this title 24/7 for one year.

  • Claim access now

    For current subscribers with Society Membership or Account Number.

  • Visit SciVerse ScienceDirect to see if you have access via your institution.
 

 This study was funded by the New York State Department of Health Dementia Grants Program (contract #C-022663). The sponsor had no role in design, methods, subject recruitment, data collection, analysis, or preparation of the manuscript. The General Clinical Research Center staff of Stony Brook University Medical Center (grant #M01RR10710) provided data management support for the study.

PII: S1525-8610(09)00201-1

doi:10.1016/j.jamda.2009.05.011

JAMDA
Volume 10, Issue 7 , Pages 505-510, September 2009