JAMDA
Volume 10, Issue 9 , Pages 639-643, November 2009

A Comparison of the Nursing Home Evacuation Experience Between Hurricanes Katrina (2005) and Gustav (2008)

  • Gary Blanchard, MD

      Affiliations

    • Division of Geriatrics, Rhode Island Hospital, Providence, RI
    • Department of Medicine & Community Health, Brown University, Providence, RI
  • ,
  • David Dosa, MD, MPH

      Affiliations

    • Division of Geriatrics, Rhode Island Hospital, Providence, RI
    • Department of Medicine & Community Health, Brown University, Providence, RI
    • Providence VA Medical Center, Providence, RI
    • Center for Gerontology and Health Care Research, Brown University
    • Corresponding Author InformationAddress correspondence to David Dosa, MD, MPH, Division of Geriatrics, Rhode Island Hospital, 593 Eddy Street, APC 424, Providence, RI 02903.

published online 12 October 2009.

Background

One of the tragic legacies of Hurricane Katrina was the loss of life among Louisiana (LA) nursing home (NH) residents. Katrina revealed a staggering lack of emergency preparation and understanding of how to safely evacuate frail populations. Three years later, LA braced for Hurricane Gustav, a storm heralded to rival Katrina's power. Although its magnitude of destruction ultimately paled to Katrina, the warnings and predicted path preceding Gustav yielded a process of NH evacuations similar to Katrina. The goal of this article was to ascertain whether NH administrative directors (ADs) felt more prepared to evacuate before Gustav.

Methods

In 2006, Dosa et al5 (J Am Med Dir Assoc, 3/07), interviewed 20 NH ADs by qualitative telephone survey to evaluate their lessons learned from Katrina. Administrators at these 20 participating nursing homes were contacted and asked to participate in a follow-up survey to compare hurricane preparedness between 2005 and 2008. Specifically, ADs were asked if they evacuated before Gustav, their destination, and about logistical issues with evacuation (eg,  transportation, injuries). ADs were asked to rate their confidence with state assistance, hurricane transportation, and evacuation preparedness on a 10-point scale (10=most confident) and compare their preparedness to Katrina.

Results

Sixteen of the 20 NHs that participated in 2006 agreed to be surveyed—11 of whom held the same position before Katrina. Unlike Katrina, when only 45% evacuated before the storm, all 16 NHs evacuated before Gustav (56% to another NH and 46% to a church, gym, college, or other facility). Overall, ADs rated their confidence in preparedness for Gustav as a mean of 8.3 (range 5 to 10) compared with a mean of 5.4 (range 3 to 8) for Katrina, a 54% improvement. Of the 11 ADs employed pre-Katrina, 73% reported improved collaboration with the state and 55% noted improved transportation. Nevertheless, 7 ADs noted significant logistical problems during evacuation (mostly transportation); 4 noted resident injuries (2 hip fractures, 1 traumatic fall, and 1 cerebrovascular accident); and 2 noted resident posttraumatic stress.

Conclusions

NH ADs felt more prepared to evacuate their residents for Gustav, owing partly to improved communication and collaboration with state agencies; however, significant morbidity and logistical problems remain with evacuating frail NH residents before hurricanes.

Keywords: Hurricane disasters, emergency preparedness, evacuation

To access this article, please choose from the options below

Login to an existing account or Register a new account.

  • Purchase this article for 31.50 USD (You must login/register to purchase this article)

    Online access for 24 hours. The PDF version can be downloaded as your permanent record.

  • Subscribe to this title

    Get unlimited online access to this article and all other articles in this title 24/7 for one year.

  • Claim access now

    For current subscribers with Society Membership or Account Number.

  • Visit SciVerse ScienceDirect to see if you have access via your institution.
 

 This study was funded by National Institutes of Health grant R01-AG030619.

PII: S1525-8610(09)00247-3

doi:10.1016/j.jamda.2009.06.010

JAMDA
Volume 10, Issue 9 , Pages 639-643, November 2009