JAMDA
Volume 11, Issue 1 , Pages 42-51, January 2010

Preferences Versus Practice: Life-Sustaining Treatments in Last Months of Life in Long-Term Care

  • Holly Biola, MD, MPH

      Affiliations

    • Geriatrics Division, Department of Medicine, Duke University, Durham, NC
    • Piedmont Health Services, Scott Community Health Center, Burlington, NC
    • Corresponding Author InformationAddress correspondence to Holly Biola, MD, MPH, Scott Community Health Center, 5270 Union Ridge Road, Burlington, NC 27217.
  • ,
  • Philip D. Sloane, MD, MPH

      Affiliations

    • Cecil G. Sheps Center for Health Services Research, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill
    • Department of Family Medicine, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill
  • ,
  • Christianna S. Williams, PhD

      Affiliations

    • Cecil G. Sheps Center for Health Services Research, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill
    • Abt Associates Inc, Durham, NC
  • ,
  • Timothy P. Daaleman, DO, MPH

      Affiliations

    • Cecil G. Sheps Center for Health Services Research, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill
    • Department of Family Medicine, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill
  • ,
  • Sheryl Zimmerman, PhD

      Affiliations

    • Cecil G. Sheps Center for Health Services Research, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill
    • School of Social Work, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill

Purpose

To determine prevalence and correlates of decisions made about specific life-sustaining treatments (LSTs) among residents in long-term care (LTC) settings, including characteristics associated with having an LST performed when the resident reportedly did not desire the LST.

Design and Participants

After-death interviews with 1 family caregiver and 1 staff caregiver for each of 327 LTC residents who died in the facility.

Setting

The setting included 27 nursing homes (NHs) and 85 residential care/assisted living (RC/AL) settings in 4 states.

Measurements

Decedent demographics, facility characteristics, prevalence of decisions made about specific LSTs, percentage of time LSTs were performed when reportedly not desired, and characteristics associated with that.

Results

Most family caregivers reported making a decision with a physician about resuscitation (89.1%), inserting a feeding tube (82.1%), administering antibiotics (64.3%), and hospital transfer (83.7%). Reported care was inconsistent with decisions made in 5 of 7 (71.4%) resuscitations, 1 of 7 feeding tube insertions (14.3%), 15 of 78 antibiotics courses (19.2%), and 26 of 87 hospital transfers (29.9%). Decedents who received antibiotics contrary to their wishes were older (mean age 92 versus 85, P=.014). More than half (53.8%) of decedents who had care discordant with their wishes about hospitalization lived in a NH compared with 32.8% of those whose decisions were concordant (P=.034).

Conclusion

Most respondents reported decision making with a doctor about life-sustaining treatments, but those decisions were not consistently heeded. Being older and living in a NH were risk factors for decisions not being heeded.

Keywords: Advance directives, end-of-life care, nursing home, assisted living

To access this article, please choose from the options below

Login to an existing account or Register a new account.

  • Purchase this article for 31.50 USD (You must login/register to purchase this article)

    Online access for 24 hours. The PDF version can be downloaded as your permanent record.

  • Subscribe to this title

    Get unlimited online access to this article and all other articles in this title 24/7 for one year.

  • Claim access now

    For current subscribers with Society Membership or Account Number.

  • Visit SciVerse ScienceDirect to see if you have access via your institution.
 

 This work was supported by grants R01 AG18967, K02 AG00970, and K23 AG001030 from the National Institute on Aging. H.B. was supported by a National Research Service Award Primary Care Research grant (T32 HP-14001–19) from the Health Resources and Services Administration as well as the Duke University Geriatrics Fellowship program. The authors have no other relevant financial disclosures to report.

PII: S1525-8610(09)00253-9

doi:10.1016/j.jamda.2009.07.005

JAMDA
Volume 11, Issue 1 , Pages 42-51, January 2010