JAMDA
Volume 11, Issue 3 , Pages 204-210, March 2010

Health Care Providers' Opinions on Communication Between Nursing Homes and Emergency Departments

  • Suzanne M. Gillespie, MD RD

      Affiliations

    • Division of Geriatrics/Aging, University of Rochester School of Medicine and Dentistry, Rochester, NY
    • Corresponding Author InformationAddress correspondence to Suzanne M. Gillespie, MD, RD, Division of Geriatrics/Aging, University of Rochester, Monroe Community Hospital 435 East Henrietta Road, Rochester, NY 14620.
  • ,
  • Lauren J. Gleason, MD

      Affiliations

    • Division of Geriatrics/Aging, University of Rochester School of Medicine and Dentistry, Rochester, NY
  • ,
  • Jurgis Karuza, PhD

      Affiliations

    • Division of Geriatrics/Aging, University of Rochester School of Medicine and Dentistry, Rochester, NY
  • ,
  • Manish N. Shah, MD MPH

      Affiliations

    • Division of Geriatrics/Aging, University of Rochester School of Medicine and Dentistry, Rochester, NY
    • Department of Emergency Medicine, University of Rochester School of Medicine and Dentistry, Rochester, NY
    • Department of Community and Preventive Medicine, University of Rochester School of Medicine and Dentistry, Rochester, NY

published online 18 January 2010.

Objectives

To characterize the beliefs and opinions of nursing home (NH) and emergency medicine providers about communication between NH and emergency departments (ED) during transitions of care of NH residents.

Design

A cross-sectional study using a mailed and Internet survey.

Participants and Setting

Physicians, nurse practitioners, physicians assistants, and nurses who practice in ED settings and NH settings, affiliated with hospitals of an academic medical center in Rochester, New York.

Measurements

Opinions on communication; beliefs about frequency of information transmission; opinions on how often verbal communication should occur.

Results

A total of 155 nurses and medical providers participated in the survey for a response rate of 32.2% (155/481). Of the survey participants, 63.0% and 56.8% had been more than 5 years in their position and facility, respectively. Most respondents felt that important information was lost during patient transfers between NH and ED settings. Providers from ED and NH settings had different opinions on the likelihood that key information would be readily identifiable at patient transfer and that care would include requested tests and follow-up. Providers from both sites of care supported verbal communication at their position when NH residents are transferred to the other setting.

Conclusion

Nurses and medical providers from both emergency and NH settings agree that transitional communication is poor between NHs and EDs and support a role for verbal communication during the ED transitions of care of NH residents.

Keywords: Transitions of care, nursing homes, emergency medicine

To access this article, please choose from the options below

Login to an existing account or Register a new account.

  • Purchase this article for 31.50 USD (You must login/register to purchase this article)

    Online access for 24 hours. The PDF version can be downloaded as your permanent record.

  • Subscribe to this title

    Get unlimited online access to this article and all other articles in this title 24/7 for one year.

  • Claim access now

    For current subscribers with Society Membership or Account Number.

  • Visit SciVerse ScienceDirect to see if you have access via your institution.
 

 S.M.G. is a recipient of a Geriatric Academic Career Award administered by the Bureau of Health Professions, Health Resources and Services Administration, US Department of Health and Human Services. S.M.G. gratefully acknowledges the support of the American Medical Directors Association (AMDA) Foundation for award of an AMDA Foundation Pfizer Quality Improvement Award which supported this study. M.N.S. is supported by the Paul B. Beeson Career Development Award (NIA 1K23AG028942)

PII: S1525-8610(09)00301-6

doi:10.1016/j.jamda.2009.09.002

JAMDA
Volume 11, Issue 3 , Pages 204-210, March 2010