JAMDA
Volume 11, Issue 2 , Pages 106-115, February 2010

Adherence to Hip Protectors and Implications for U.S. Long-Term Care Settings

  • Sheryl Zimmerman, PhD

      Affiliations

    • Program on Aging, Disability and Long-Term Care, Cecil G. Sheps Center for Health Services Research, and the School of Social Work, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC
    • Corresponding Author InformationAddress correspondence to Sheryl Zimmerman, PhD, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Cecil G. Sheps Center for Health Services Research, 725 Martin Luther King Jr. Boulevard, Chapel Hill, NC 27590–7599.
    • ,
  • Jay Magaziner, PhD

      Affiliations

    • Division of Gerontology, Department of Epidemiology and Preventive Medicine, University of Maryland Baltimore, Baltimore, MD
    • ,
  • Stanley J. Birge, MD

      Affiliations

    • Division of Geriatrics and Nutritional Science, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, MO
    • ,
  • Bruce A. Barton, PhD

      Affiliations

    • Maryland Medical Research Institute, Baltimore, MD
    • ,
  • Shari S. Kronsberg, MS

      Affiliations

    • Maryland Medical Research Institute, Baltimore, MD
    • ,
  • Douglas P. Kiel, MD, MPH

      Affiliations

    • Hebrew Senior Life Institute for Aging Research and Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA

published online 06 January 2010.

Objectives

Determine nursing home characteristics related to adherence to use of a hip protector (HP) to prevent fracture; also describe adherence and related resident characteristics.

Design

A multicenter, randomized controlled trial of a HP in which adherence to wearing the HP was monitored by research staff 3 times a week for up to 21 months; data were collected by interviews and chart review.

Setting

Thirty-five nursing homes in Boston, St. Louis, and Baltimore.

Participants

A total of 797 eligible residents, 633 (79%) of whom passed the run-in period, 397 (63%) of whom remained in the study until the end of follow-up.

Intervention

Residents wore a single HP on their right or left side.

Measurements

In addition to regular monitoring of adherence, data were collected regarding facility characteristics, staffing, policies and procedures, perception of HPs and related experience, and research staff ratings of environmental and overall quality; and also resident demographic characteristics, and function, health, and psychosocial status.

Results

Facility characteristics related to more adherence were not being chain-affiliated; less Medicaid case-mix; fewer residents wearing HPs; more paraprofessional staff training; more rotating workers; and having administrators who were less involved in meetings.

Conclusion

Efforts to increase adherence to the use of HPs should focus on facilities with more Medicaid case-mix to reduce disparities in care, and those that have less of a culture of training. Staff may need support to increase adherence, and when adherence cannot be maintained, HP use should be targeted to those who remain adherent.

Keywords: Hip fracture, nursing homes, compliance

To access this article, please choose from the options below

Login to an existing account or Register a new account.

  • Purchase this article for 31.50 USD (You must login/register to purchase this article)

    Online access for 24 hours. The PDF version can be downloaded as your permanent record.

  • Subscribe to this title

    Get unlimited online access to this article and all other articles in this title 24/7 for one year.

  • Claim access now

    For current subscribers with Society Membership or Account Number.

  • Visit SciVerse ScienceDirect to see if you have access via your institution.
 

 Funded by National Institutes of Health, National Institute on Aging grant R01 AG018461 and supported in part by the Lawrence J. and Anne Cable Rubenstein Charitable Foundation.

PII: S1525-8610(09)00346-6

doi:10.1016/j.jamda.2009.09.013

JAMDA
Volume 11, Issue 2 , Pages 106-115, February 2010

Article Tools

* Image Usage & Resolution