JAMDA
Volume 11, Issue 9 , Pages 645-653, November 2010

Does Self-Reported Function Correspond to Objective Measures of Functional Impairment?

  • Yuchi Young, DrPH

      Affiliations

    • State University of New York (SUNY) at Albany, School of Public Health, Rensselaer, NY
    • Corresponding Author InformationAddress correspondence to Yuchi Young, DrPH, Health Policy, Management and Behavior, School of Public Health, State University of New York (SUNY) at Albany, 1 University Place, Room 171, Rensselaer, NY 12144.
  • ,
  • Cynthia M. Boyd, MD, MPH

      Affiliations

    • Division of Geriatric Medicine and Gerontology, Johns Hopkins Medical Institutions, Baltimore, MD
  • ,
  • Jack M. Guralnik, MD, PhD

      Affiliations

    • National Institute on Aging, Bethesda, MD
  • ,
  • Linda P. Fried, MD, MPH

      Affiliations

    • Columbia University, Joseph L. Mailman School of Public Health, New York, NY
    • Center on Aging and Health, Johns Hopkins Medical Institutions, Baltimore, MD
    • Division of Geriatric Medicine and Gerontology, Johns Hopkins Medical Institutions, Baltimore, MD

published online 01 July 2010.

Introduction

The relationship between self-reported function and objective measures of physiological function among disabled older women was analyzed to determine the validity of self-reported function, and to identify the hierarchy of self-reported task difficulty most associated with loss of independence as a basis to inform treatment progress goals.

Methods

A randomly selected population of older women with moderate to high disability was selected from community-dwelling women 65 to 101 years old from the Women's Health and Aging Study I baseline evaluation (n = 987). Cross-sectional analyses evaluated the association of self-reported function with objective physiological impairment measures.

Results

The results indicated that (1) disabled older women self-reported a broad range of physical function levels; (2) self-reported function correlated closely with objective measures of physiological impairments; (3) “preclinical disability,” as measured by self-reported modification of task performance in the absence of perceived difficulty, has validity even in a disabled population, and identifies a group intermediate between those who are high functioning in a task and those with difficulty; and (4) there is an apparent gradation in physiological impairment measures with reported loss of functional independence.

Conclusion

These findings suggest the validity of self-report functional disability measures and the potential to use these measures to identify already-disabled older adults at risk for further functional degradation and potential targets for intervention.

Keywords: Aging, disability, impairments

To access this article, please choose from the options below

Login to an existing account or Register a new account.

  • Purchase this article for 31.50 USD (You must login/register to purchase this article)

    Online access for 24 hours. The PDF version can be downloaded as your permanent record.

  • Subscribe to this title

    Get unlimited online access to this article and all other articles in this title 24/7 for one year.

  • Claim access now

    For current subscribers with Society Membership or Account Number.

  • Visit SciVerse ScienceDirect to see if you have access via your institution.
 

 This work was supported by National Institutes of Health grant R37-AG19905 and contract N01AG1–2112. Supported in part by the Intramural Research Program, National Institute on Aging, National Institutes of Health.

PII: S1525-8610(09)00520-9

doi:10.1016/j.jamda.2009.12.084

JAMDA
Volume 11, Issue 9 , Pages 645-653, November 2010