JAMDA
Volume 12, Issue 1 , Pages 38-43, January 2011

Validation of the Minimum Data Set in Identifying Hospitalization Events and Payment Source

  • Shubing Cai, PhD

      Affiliations

    • Center for Gerontology and Health Care Research, The Warren Alpert Medical School, Brown University, Providence, RI
    • Corresponding Author InformationAddress correspondence to Shubing Cai, PhD, Center for Gerontology and Health Care Research The Warren Alpert Medical School, Brown University, 121 S. Main Street, Box G-S121 (6), Providence, RI 02912.
  • ,
  • Dana B. Mukamel, PhD

      Affiliations

    • Department of Medicine, Health Policy Research Institute, University of California, Irvine, Irvine CA
  • ,
  • Peter Veazie, PhD

      Affiliations

    • Department of Community and Preventive Medicine, University of Rochester School of Medicine, Rochester, NY
  • ,
  • Helena Temkin-Greener, PhD

      Affiliations

    • Department of Community and Preventive Medicine, University of Rochester School of Medicine, Rochester, NY

published online 09 August 2010.

Objectives

To evaluate the accuracy of the Minimum Data Set (MDS) in identifying hospitalization events and payment source among nursing home residents.

Research Design

The 2003 MDS, Medicare Provider Analysis and Review File (MedPAR), Medicare denominator file, Medicaid Analytical Extract (MAX) long-term care file, and MAX personal summary file for 4 states (California, Ohio, New York, and Texas) were obtained and merged.

Setting

All Medicare/Medicaid-certified nursing ho-mes in these 4 states during 2003.

Participants

All nursing home residents who were eligible for Medicare. Medicare or Medicaid managed care enrollees were excluded.

Measurements

Using the identification by linking the MDS and claims data as the “gold standard,” we calculated false negative and false positive error rates of the MDS in identifying hospitalization events and payment source.

Results

As for the accuracy of the MDS in identifying hospitalization events, the false negative error rates ranged from 6.8% to 19.5% and the false positive error rates were between 12.0% and 15.7%, depending on the state. With regard to the identification of Medicare payment source, the MDS had a low false negative rate (varying from 0.4% to 1.1%), and a relatively high false positive rate (ranging from 6.1% to 14.9%). The MDS alone did not seem to be a sufficient source for identification of Medicaid payment source (false negative rate ranging from 11.0% to 55.3%).

Conclusions

The accuracy of the MDS in identifying hospitalizations and payment sources varies across the study states, and should be evaluated carefully with regard to the intended uses of the data.

Keywords: MDS, nursing home, data quality, hospitalization, payment source

 

 We gratefully acknowledge financial support from the National Institute on Aging, Grant R01 AG23077.

PII: S1525-8610(10)00058-7

doi:10.1016/j.jamda.2010.02.001

JAMDA
Volume 12, Issue 1 , Pages 38-43, January 2011