JAMDA
Volume 13, Issue 2 , Pages 188.e7-188.e12, February 2012

Scope and Severity Index: A Metric for Quantifying Nursing Home Survey Deficiency Number, Scope, and Severity Adjusted for the State-Related Measurement Bias

  • Evgeniya Antonova, MS, PhD

      Affiliations

    • Corresponding Author InformationAddress correspondence to Evgeniya Antonova, MS, PhD, MedImmune, Inc. 1 Medimmune Way, Gaithersburg, MD 20878.
  • ,
  • David Zimmerman, PhD

University of Wisconsin, Madison, WI

published online 17 June 2011.

Abstract 

Objectives

To develop a metric (scope and severity index [SSI]) to measure nursing home deficiency number, scope, and severity adjusted for the state-related bias and to test its convergent and predictive validity.

Design

We assigned scope and severity weights to each level of scope and severity (A-L). SSI was calculated as a sum of all weights per survey which was further corrected for the state-level bias by dividing by the state average number of health deficiencies and multiplying by the national average number of health deficiencies. Data source - National Online Survey, Certification, and Reporting system.

Setting

All Medicare/Medicaid-certified skilled nursing facilities.

Measurements

We correlated SSI with nursing home staffing levels (convergent validity) and denial of payment for new admissions (predictive validity).

Results

The expert panel reached agreement on the scope and severity weights: Level A = 5, B = 10, C = 15, D = 20, E = 30, F = 40, G = 35, H = 50, I = 65, J = 55, K = 75, and L = 100 points. Scope and severity per deficiency was positively correlated with the number of deficiencies in that survey. SSI contained almost no state-related bias, but yet related state-level variability. It demonstrated strong face, convergent, and predictive validity.

Conclusions

SSI rendered a valuable metric to conduct quantitative analyses of nursing home deficiency number, scope, and severity across states. Future research should investigate the positive relationship between scope and severity of deficiencies and their number. Better understanding and correction of other factors introducing systematic bias to the survey results (e.g. regional impact) can further improve the accuracy of survey result evaluation.

Keywords: Nursing homes, state surveys, Delphi technique, staffing, care quality

To access this article, please choose from the options below

Login to an existing account or Register a new account.

  • Purchase this article for 31.50 USD (You must login/register to purchase this article)

    Online access for 24 hours. The PDF version can be downloaded as your permanent record.

  • Subscribe to this title

    Get unlimited online access to this article and all other articles in this title 24/7 for one year.

  • Claim access now

    For current subscribers with Society Membership or Account Number.

  • Visit SciVerse ScienceDirect to see if you have access via your institution.
 

 The authors have declared no conflicts of interest.

PII: S1525-8610(11)00168-X

doi:10.1016/j.jamda.2011.04.021

JAMDA
Volume 13, Issue 2 , Pages 188.e7-188.e12, February 2012