Animal-Assisted Therapy and Loneliness in Nursing Homes: Use of Robotic versus Living Dogs

      Loneliness is a common problem in long-term care facilities (LTCF) and previous work has shown that animal-assisted therapy (AAT) can to some degree reverse loneliness. Here, we compared the ability of a living dog (Dog) and a robotic dog (AIBO) to treat loneliness in elderly patients living in LTCF. In comparison with a control group not receiving AAT, both the Dog and AIBO groups had statistically significant improvements in their levels of loneliness. As measured by a modified Lexington Attachment to Pets Scale (MLAPS), residents showed high levels of attachment to both the dog and AIBO. Subscale analysis showed that the AIBO group scored lower than the living dog on “animal rights/animal welfare” but not on “general attachment” or “people substituting.” However, MLAPS measures did not correlate with changes in loneliness, showing that attachment was not the mechanism by which AAT decreases loneliness. We conclude that interactive robotic dogs can reduce loneliness in residents of LTCF and that residents become attached to these robots. However, level of attachment does not explain the decrease in loneliness associated with AAT conducted with either a living or robotic dog.


      To read this article in full you will need to make a payment

      Purchase one-time access:

      Academic & Personal: 24 hour online accessCorporate R&D Professionals: 24 hour online access
      One-time access price info
      • For academic or personal research use, select 'Academic and Personal'
      • For corporate R&D use, select 'Corporate R&D Professionals'


      Subscribe to Journal of the American Medical Directors Association
      Already a print subscriber? Claim online access
      Already an online subscriber? Sign in
      Institutional Access: Sign in to ScienceDirect


        • Russell D.W.
        • Cutrona C.E.
        Loneliness and nursing home admission among rural older adults.
        Psychol Aging. 1997; 12: 574-589
        • Peplau L.A.
        • Perlman D.
        Loneliness: A source book of current theory, research and theory.
        John Wiley and Sons, New York1982
        • Holmen K.
        • Ericsson K.
        • Andersson L.
        • Winblad B.
        Loneliness among elderly people living in Stockholm: A population study.
        J Adv Nurs. 1992; 17: 43-51
        • Paunonen M.
        • Haggman-Laitilla A.
        Life situation of aged home-nursing clients.
        J Community Health Nurs. 1990; 7: 167-178
        • Russel D.W.
        UCLA loneliness scale (Version 3): Reliability, validity, and factor structure.
        J Personality Assessment. 1996; 66: 20-40
        • Goldmeier J.
        Pets or people: Another research note.
        Gerontologist. 1986; 26: 203-206
        • Calvert M.M.
        Human-pet interaction and loneliness: A test of concepts from Roy’s adaptation model.
        Nurs Sci Q. 1989; 2: 194-202
        • Banks M.R.
        • Banks W.A.
        The effects of animal-assisted therapy on loneliness in an elderly population in long-term care facilities.
        J Gerontol A Biol Sci Med Sci. 2002; 57A: M428-M432
        • Banks M.R.
        • Banks W.A.
        The effects of group and individual animal-assisted therapy on loneliness in residents of long-term care facilities.
        Anthrozoos. 2005; 18: 396-408
        • Bowlby J.
        Attachment theory, separation anxiety, and mourning.
        in: Arieti S. American Handbook of Psychiatry. Basic Books, New York1974: 292-309
        • Baun M.M.
        • Bergstrom N.
        • Langston N.F.
        • Thoma L.
        Physiological effects of human/companion animal bonding.
        Nurs Res. 1984; 33: 126-129
        • Voith V.L.
        Attachment of people to companion animals.
        Vet Clin North Am. 1985; 15: 289-295
        • Ory M.G.
        • Goldberg E.L.
        Pet possessions and life satisfaction in elderly women.
        in: Katcher A.H. Beck A.M. New Perspectives on Our Lives with Companion Animals. University of Pennsylvania Press, Philadelphia1983: 303-319
        • Garrity T.F.
        • Stallones L.
        • Marx M.B.
        • Johnson T.P.
        Pet ownership and attachment supportive factors in the health of the elderly.
        Anthrozoos. 1989; 3: 35-43
        • Johnson T.P.
        • Garrity T.F.
        • Stallones L.
        Psychometric evaluation of the Lexington attachment to pets scale (LAPS).
        Anthrozoos. 1992; 5: 160-175
        • Friedman B.
        • Kahn P.H.
        • Hagman J.
        Hardware companions?.
        Proceedings of CHI. 2003; 5: 273-280
        • Melson G.F.
        • Kahn P.H.
        • Beck A.M.
        • Friedman B.
        • Roberts T.
        • Garrett E.
        Robots as Dogs?.
        Proceedings of CHI. 2005; : 1649-1652
        • Kanamori M.
        • Suzuki M.
        • Tanaka M.
        [Maintenance and improvement of quality of life among elderly patients using a pet-type robot].
        Nippon Ronen Iggakkai Zasshi. 2002; 39 (Japanese): 214-218
        • Folstein M.F.
        • Folstein S.E.
        • McHugh P.R.
        Mini-Mental State: A practical guide for grading the cognitive state of patients for the clinician.
        J Psychiatr Res. 1975; 12: 189-198