Advertisement
Original Study| Volume 15, ISSUE 11, P802-806, November 2014

Finding Gertrude: The Resident's Voice in Minimum Data Set 3.0

      Abstract

      Purpose

      The new Minimum Data Set 3.0 was designed to improve the assessment process by requiring nursing home (NH) staff to attempt to interview residents with scripted questions to assess subjective states such as pain, mood, and cognitive functioning. Although the case has been made that resident self-report is important, it is unknown whether facilities are doing so in practice. We examined the frequency of attempts to interview residents to elucidate the types of residents able to be interviewed about their clinical conditions and facility characteristics related to the likelihood of attempt.

      Design and Methods

      Data come from Minimum Data Set 3.0 annual assessments for 757,044 residents in 15,030 NHs during 2011–2012 and the 2011 Online Survey, Certification, and Reporting database. Hierarchical generalized linear models were conducted to test the association between resident and facility characteristics and the attempt rate of resident interview for 3 clinical domains (cognition, mood, and pain).

      Results

      Over 83% of long-stay residents attempted all 3 self-report clinical items. The rates of attempt for mood, cognition, and pain were 88%, 89%, and 92%, respectively. Results from hierarchical generalized linear models suggest that certain resident characteristics are related to the likelihood of participating in interviews, in particular neither having a diagnosis of dementia nor cognitive impairment, not exhibiting signs of delirium, nor a documented prognosis of 6 months or less to live. Residents in smaller, chain-affiliated nursing homes with fewer Medicare residents and fewer assessments per administrative nurse and registered nurse were more likely to attempt the resident interview items.

      Implications

      This article documents the high rate of NH residents' participation in interviews about their clinical states. Furthermore, we identify types of residents for whom additional investigation into ways to achieve higher rates of participation is required and facility resources that are related to the likelihood of high rates of attempt.

      Keywords

      To read this article in full you will need to make a payment

      Purchase one-time access:

      Academic & Personal: 24 hour online accessCorporate R&D Professionals: 24 hour online access
      One-time access price info
      • For academic or personal research use, select 'Academic and Personal'
      • For corporate R&D use, select 'Corporate R&D Professionals'

      Subscribe:

      Subscribe to Journal of the American Medical Directors Association
      Already a print subscriber? Claim online access
      Already an online subscriber? Sign in
      Institutional Access: Sign in to ScienceDirect

      References

        • Fries B.E.
        • Hawes C.
        • Morris J.N.
        • et al.
        Effect of the National Resident Assessment Instrument on selected health conditions and problems.
        J Am Geriatr Soc. 1997; 45: 994-1001
        • Hawes C.
        • Mor V.
        • Phillips C.D.
        • et al.
        The OBRA-87 nursing home regulations and implementation of the Resident Assessment Instrument: Effects on process quality.
        J Am Geriatr Soc. 1997; 45: 977-985
        • Phillips C.D.
        • Morris J.N.
        • Hawes C.
        • et al.
        Association of the Resident Assessment Instrument (RAI) with changes in function, cognition, and psychosocial status.
        J Am Geriatr Soc. 1997; 45: 986-993
        • Ouslander J.G.
        The Resident Assessment Instrument (RAI): Promise and pitfalls.
        J Am Geriatr Soc. 1997; 45: 975-976
        • Schnelle J.F.
        Can nursing homes use the MDS to improve quality?.
        J Am Geriatr Soc. 1997; 45: 1027-1028
        • Uman G.C.
        Where's Gertrude?.
        J Am Geriatr Soc. 1997; 45: 1025-1026
        • Saliba D.
        • Jones M.
        • Streim J.
        • et al.
        Overview of significant changes in the Minimum Data Set for nursing homes version 3.0.
        J Am Med Dir Assoc. 2012; 13: 595-601
        • Saliba D.
        • Buchanan J.
        Making the investment count: Revision of the Minimum Data Set for nursing homes, MDS 3.0.
        J Am Med Dir Assoc. 2012; 13: 602-610
      1. Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services. Minimum data set, version 3.0 (MDS 3.0). 2010. Available at: https://www.cms.gov/NursingHomeQualityInits/45_NHQIMDS30TrainingMaterials.asp#TopOPage. Accessed July 11, 2013.

        • Kane R.
        Mandated Assessments. Assessing Older Persons.
        Oxford University Press, NY2000
        • Chodosh J.
        • Petitti D.B.
        • Elliott M.
        • et al.
        Physician recognition of cognitive impairment: Evaluating the need for improvement.
        J Am Geriatr Soc. 2004; 52: 1051-1059
        • Pinholt E.M.
        • Kroenke K.
        • Hanley J.F.
        • et al.
        Functional assessment of the elderly. A comparison of standard instruments with clinical judgment.
        Arch Intern Med. 1987; 147: 484-488
        • Sørensen L.
        • Foldspang A.
        • Gulmann N.C.
        • Munk-Jørgensen P.
        Assessment of dementia in nursing home residents by nurses and assistants: Criteria validity and determinants.
        Int J Geriatr Psychiatry. 2001; 16: 615-621
        • Lin W.C.
        • Lum T.Y.
        • Mehr D.R.
        • Kane R.L.
        Measuring pain presence and intensity in nursing home residents.
        J Am Med Dir Assoc. 2006; 7: 147-153
        • Jones K.R.
        • Fink T.
        • Hutt E.
        • et al.
        Measuring pain intensity in nursing home residents.
        J Pain Symptom Manage. 2005; 30: 519-527
        • Jones A.L.
        • Dwyer L.L.
        • Bercovitz A.R.
        • Strahan G.W.
        The National Nursing Home Survey: 2004 overview.
        Vital Health Stat. 2009; 167: 1-155
        • Saliba D.
        • Buchanan J.
        Development and Validation of a Revised Nursing Home Assessment Tool: MDS 3.0.
        RAND Health Coorporation, Santa Monica, CA2008
        • Dosa D.
        • Intrator O.
        • McNicoll L.
        • et al.
        Preliminary derivation of a Nursing Home Confusion Assessment Method based on data from the Minimum Data Set.
        J Am Geriatr Soc. 2007; 55: 1099-1105
        • Zinn J.
        • Feng Z.
        • Mor V.
        • et al.
        Restructuring in response to case mix reimbursement in nursing homes: A contingency approach.
        Health Care Manage Rev. 2008; 33: 113-123
        • Saliba D.
        • Buchanan J.
        • Edelen M.O.
        • et al.
        MDS 3.0: Brief interview for mental status.
        J Am Med Dir Assoc. 2012; 13: 611-617
        • Saliba D.
        • DiFilippo S.
        • Edelen M.O.
        • et al.
        Testing the PHQ-9 interview and Observational Versions (PHQ-9 OV) for MDS 3.0.
        J Am Med Dir Assoc. 2012; 13: 618-625