Advertisement

Nonpharmacologic Interventions to Prevent Pressure Ulcers in Older Patients: An Overview of Systematic Reviews (The Software ENgine for the Assessment and optimization of drug and non-drug Therapy in Older peRsons [SENATOR] Definition of Optimal Evidence-Based Non-drug Therapies in Older People [ONTOP] Series)

Published:February 05, 2016DOI:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jamda.2015.12.091

      Abstract

      Background

      Pressure ulcers (PUs) are frequent in older patients, and the healing process is usually challenging, therefore, prevention should be the first strategic line in PU management. Nonpharmacologic interventions may play a role in the prevention of PUs in older people, but most systematic reviews (SRs) have not addressed this specific population using convincing outcome measures.

      Objective

      To summarize and critically appraise the evidence from SRs of the primary studies on nonpharmacologic interventions to prevent PUs in older patients.

      Design

      SR and meta-analysis of comparative studies.

      Data sources

      PubMed, Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews, EMBASE, and CINHAL (from inception to October 2013) were searched. A new search for updates in the Cochrane Database was launched in July 2014.

      Eligibility criteria for selecting studies

      SRs that included at least 1 comparative study evaluating any nonpharmacologic intervention to prevent PUs in older patients, in any healthcare setting, were selected. Any primary study with experimental design was then identified and included.

      Data extraction

      From each primary study, quality assessment was undertaken as specified by the Cochrane Collaboration and the Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation working group. Interventions were identified and compared among different studies to explore the possibility of performing a meta-analysis, using the incidence of new pressure ulcers as the main outcome measure.

      Results

      One hundred ten SRs with 65 primary studies satisfied the inclusion criteria. The most frequent interventions explored in these trials were support surfaces (41 studies), repositioning (8), and nutrition interventions (5). High quality of evidence was not found for any intervention, mainly because of a high risk of bias and imprecision. There is moderate quality evidence to support the use of alternating pressure support mattresses over usual hospital mattresses in medical and surgical inpatients, low quality evidence to support constant low pressure devices and Australian medical sheepskin over usual mattresses, and very low quality evidence to support nutrition interventions in hospital settings. No recommendations on hydration, repositioning, standardized risk assessment, or multicomponent interventions can be done.

      Conclusions

      In older patients at high risk to suffer PUs, high-technology and low- technology support surfaces can significantly reduce the incidence of PUs. Nutrition intervention may also have a role in preventing PUs in hospital settings. More evidence is needed to support other recommendations, which is specially lacking for repositioning.

      Keywords

      To read this article in full you will need to make a payment

      Purchase one-time access:

      Academic & Personal: 24 hour online accessCorporate R&D Professionals: 24 hour online access
      One-time access price info
      • For academic or personal research use, select 'Academic and Personal'
      • For corporate R&D use, select 'Corporate R&D Professionals'

      Subscribe:

      Subscribe to Journal of the American Medical Directors Association
      Already a print subscriber? Claim online access
      Already an online subscriber? Sign in
      Institutional Access: Sign in to ScienceDirect

      References

        • European Pressure Ulcer Advisory Panel (EPUAP) and National Pressure Ulcer Advisory Panel (NPUAP)
        Prevention and treatment of pressure ulcers: quick reference guide.
        National Pressure Ulcer Advisory Panel, Washington DC2009
        • Vanderwee K.
        • Clark M.
        • Dealey C.
        • et al.
        Pressure ulcer prevalence in Europe: A pilot study.
        J Eval Clin Pract. 2007; 13: 227-235
        • Brandeis G.H.
        • Morris J.N.
        • Nash D.J.
        • Lipsitz L.A.
        The epidemiology and natural history of pressure ulcers in elderly nursing home residents.
        JAMA. 1990; 264: 2905-2909
        • Ronda L.
        • Falce R.L.
        Skin care in older people.
        Primary Health Care. 2002; 12: 51-57
        • Spoelhof G.D.
        Management of pressure ulcers in the nursing home.
        Ann Longterm Care. 2000; 8: 69-77
        • Berlowitz D.R.
        • Wilkin S.V.B.
        Risk factors for pressure sores: A comparison of cross-sectional and cohort derived data.
        J Am Geriatr Soc. 1989; 37: 1043-1050
        • Allman R.M.
        Pressure ulcer prevalence, incidence, risk factors, and impact.
        Clin Geriatr Med. 1997; 13: 421-436
        • Casey G.
        The importance of nutrition in wound healing.
        Nurs Stand. 1998; 13: 51-52
        • Krause T.
        • Anders J.
        • von Renteln-Kruse W.
        Urinary incontinence as a risk factor for pressure sores does not withstand a critical examination.
        Pflege. 2005; 18: 299-303
        • Gallagher S.M.
        Morbid obesity: A chronic disease with an impact on wounds and related problems.
        Ostomy Wound Manage. 1997; 43 (26–7): 18-24
        • Vélez-Díaz-Pallarés M.
        • Lozano-Montoya I.
        • Abraha I.
        • et al.
        Nonpharmacologic interventions to heal pressure ulcers in older patients: An overview of systematic reviews (The SENATOR-ONTOP Series).
        J Am Med Dir Assoc. 2015; 16: 448-469
        • Scott J.R.
        • Gibran N.S.
        • Engrav L.H.
        • et al.
        Incidence and characteristics of hospitalized patients with pressure ulcers: State of Washington, 1987 to 2000.
        Plast Reconstr Surg. 2006; 117: 630-634
      1. Pressure ulcers: Prevention and management of pressure ulcers. NICE clinical guideline 179. Available at: guidance.nice.org.uk/cg179. Issued in April 2014. Accessed September 22, 2014.

        • Saha S.
        • Smith M.E.B.
        • Totten A.
        • et al.
        Pressure Ulcer Treatment Strategies: Comparative Effectiveness. Comparative Effectiveness Review No. 90.
        (Prepared by the Oregon Evidence-based Practice Center under Contract No. 290-2007-10057-I.) AHRQ Publication No. 13-EHC003-EF Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality, Rockville, MD2013 (Available at:) (Accessed September 12, 2014)
        • Abraha I.
        • Cruz-Jentoft A.J.
        • Soiza R.L.
        • et al.
        Evidence of and recommendations for nonpharmacologic interventions for common geriatric conditions. The SENATOR-ONTOP Systematic Review Protocol.
        BMJ Open. 2015; 5: e007488
      2. Schünemann H, Brożek J, Guyatt G, Oxman A, eds. GRADE handbook for grading quality of evidence and strength of recommendations. Updated October 2013. The GRADE Working Group, 2013. Available at: www.guidelinedevelopment.org/handbook. Accessed September 12, 2014.

        • Montori V.M.
        • Wilczynski N.L.
        • Morgan D.
        • et al.
        Optimal search strategies for retrieving systematic reviews from Medline: Analytical survey.
        BMJ. 2005; 330: 68
      3. Higgins JPT, Altman DG, on behalf of the Cochrane Statistical Methods Group and the Cochrane Bias Methods Group (editors). Chapter 8: Assessing risk of bias in included studies. In: Higgins JPT, Green S, eds. Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions Version 5.1.0 [updated March 2011]. The Cochrane Collaboration, 2011.

      4. National Pressure Advisory Panel. Support surfaces standard initiative. Terms and definitions relate to support surfaces. Version 01/29/2007. Available at: http://www.npuap.org/wp–content/uploads/2012/03/NPUAP_S3I_TD.pdf. Accessed September 12, 2014.

        • Cullum N.
        • Nelson E.A.
        • Flemming K.
        • Sheldon T.
        Systematic reviews of wound care management: (5) beds; (6) compression; (7) laser therapy, therapeutic ultrasound, electrotherapy and electromagnetic therapy.
        Health Technol Assess. 2001; 5: 1-221
        • Andersen K.E.
        • Jensen O.
        • Kvorning S.A.
        • Bach E.
        Decubitus prophylaxis: A prospective trial on the efficiency of alternating-pressure air-mattresses and water mattresses.
        Acta Derm Venereol. 1983; 63: 227-230
        • Aronovitch S.A.
        • Wilber M.
        • Slezak S.
        • et al.
        A comparative study of an alternating air mattress for the prevention of pressure ulcers in surgical patients.
        Ostomy Wound Manage. 1999; 45 (42–44): 34-40
        • Bennett R.G.
        • Baran P.J.
        • DeVone L.V.
        • et al.
        Low air-loss hydrotherapy versus standard care for incontinent hospitalized patients.
        J Am Geriatr Soc. 1998; 46: 569-576
        • Demarre L.
        • Beeckman D.
        • Vanderwee K.
        • et al.
        Multistage versus single-stage inflation and deflation cycle for alternating low pressure air mattresses to prevent pressure ulcers in patients: A randomized-controlled clinical trial.
        Int J Nurs Stud. 2012; 49: 416-426
        • Exton-Smith A.N.
        • Overstall P.W.
        • Wedgewood J.
        • Wallace G.
        Use of the “air wave system” to prevent pressure sores in hospital.
        Lancet. 1982; 1: 1288-1290
        • Hampton S.
        Evaluation of the new Cairwave therapy system in one hospital trust.
        Br J Nurs. 1997; 6: 167-170
        • Nixon J.
        • Cranny G.
        • Iglesias C.
        • et al.
        Randomized, controlled trial of alternating pressure mattresses compared with alternating pressure overlays for the prevention of pressure ulcers: PRESSURE (pressure relieving support surfaces) trial.
        BMJ. 2006; 332: 1413
        • Price P.
        • Bale S.
        • Newcombe R.
        • Harding K.
        Challenging the pressure sore paradigm.
        J Wound Care. 1999; 8: 187-190
        • Russell J.A.
        • Lichtenstein S.L.
        Randomized controlled trial to determine the safety and efficacy of a multicell pulsating dynamic mattress system in the prevention of pressure ulcers in patients undergoing cardiovascular surgery.
        Ostomy Wound Manage. 2000; 46 (54–55): 46-51
        • Sanada H.
        • Sugama J.
        • Matsui Y.
        • et al.
        Randomized controlled trial to evaluate a new double-layer air-cell overlay for elderly patients requiring head elevation.
        J Tissue Viability. 2003; 13 (116, 118 passim): 112-114
        • Stapleton M.
        Preventing pressure sores- an evaluation of three products… foam, ripple pads, and Spenco pads.
        Geriatr Nurs (Lond). 1986; 6: 23-25
        • Taylor L.
        Evaluating the Pegasus Trinova: A data hierarchy approach.
        Br J Nurs. 1999; 8 (776–778): 771-774
        • Vanderwee K.
        • Grypdonck M.H.
        • Defloor T.
        Effectiveness of an alternating pressure air mattress for the prevention of pressure ulcers.
        Age Ageing. 2005; 34: 261-267
        • Whitney J.D.
        • Fellows B.J.
        • Larson E.
        Do mattresses make a difference?.
        J Gerontol Nurs. 1984; 10: 20-25
        • Cavicchioli A.
        • Carella G.
        Clinical effectiveness of a low-tech versus high-tech pressure-redistributing mattress.
        J Wound Care. 2007; 16: 285-289
        • Bliss M.R.
        • McLaren R.
        • Exton-Smith A.N.
        Preventing pressure sores in hospital: Controlled trial of a large-celled ripple mattress.
        Br Med J. 1967; 1: 394-397
        • Berthe J.V.
        • Bustillo A.
        • Melot C.
        • de Fontaine S.
        Does a foamy-block mattress system prevent pressure sores? A prospective randomized clinical trial in 1729 patients.
        Acta Chir Belg. 2007; 107: 155-161
        • Collier M.E.
        Pressure-reducing mattresses.
        J Wound Care. 1996; 5: 207-211
        • Cooper P.J.
        • Gray D.G.
        • Mollison J.
        A randomized controlled trial of two pressure-reducing surfaces.
        J Wound Care. 1998; 7: 374-376
        • Donnelly J.
        • Winder J.
        • Kernohan W.G.
        • Stevenson M.
        An RCT to determine the effect of a heel elevation device in pressure ulcer prevention post-hip fracture.
        J Wound Care. 2011; 20 (314–318): 309-312
        • Gilcreast D.M.
        • Warren J.B.
        • Yoder L.H.
        • et al.
        Research comparing three heel ulcer-prevention devices.
        J Wound Ostomy Continence Nurs. 2005; 32: 112-120
        • Goldstone L.A.
        • Norris M.
        • O'Reilly M.
        • White J.
        A clinical trial of a bead bed system for the prevention of pressure sores in elderly orthopedic patients.
        J Adv Nurs. 1982; 7: 545-548
        • Gray D.G.
        • Campbell M.
        A randomized clinical trial of two types of foam mattresses.
        J Tissue Viability. 1994; 4: 128-132
        • Gray D.G.
        • Smith M.
        Comparison of a new foam mattress with the standard hospital mattress.
        J Wound Care. 2000; 9: 29-31
        • Gunningberg L.
        • Lindholm C.
        • Carlsson M.
        • Sjödén P.O.
        Effect of viscoelastic foam mattresses on the development of pressure ulcers in patients with hip fractures.
        J Wound Care. 2000; 9: 455-460
        • Hofman A.
        • Geelkerken R.H.
        • Wille J.
        • et al.
        Pressure sores and pressure-decreasing mattresses: Controlled clinical trial.
        Lancet. 1994; 343: 568-571
        • Jolley D.J.
        • Wright R.
        • McGowan S.
        • et al.
        Preventing pressure ulcers with the Australian Medical Sheepskin: An open-label randomized controlled trial.
        Med J Aust. 2004; 180: 324-327
        • Kemp M.G.
        • Kopanke D.
        • Tordecilla L.
        • et al.
        The role of support surfaces and patient attributes in preventing pressure ulcers in elderly patients.
        Res Nurs Health. 1993; 16: 89-96
        • Lazzara D.J.
        • Buschmann M.T.
        Prevention of pressure ulcers in elderly nursing home residents: Are special support surfaces the answer?.
        Decubitus. 1991; 4: 42-48
        • McGowan S.
        • Montgomery K.
        • Jolley D.
        • Wright R.
        The role of sheepskins in preventing pressure ulcers in elderly orthopedic patients.
        Primary Intention. 2000; 8: 127-134
        • Mistiaen P.
        • Achterberg W.
        • Ament A.
        • et al.
        The effectiveness of the Australian Medical Sheepskin for the prevention of pressure ulcers in somatic nursing home patients: A prospective multicenter randomized-controlled trial (ISRCTN17553857).
        Wound Repair Regen. 2010; 18: 572-579
        • Ricci E.
        • Cassino R.
        • Ippolito A.M.
        • et al.
        A randomized study on the effectiveness of a new pressure-relieving mattress overlay for the prevention of pressure ulcers in elderly patients at risk.
        EWMA J. 2013; 13: 27-32
        • Russell L.J.
        • Reynolds T.M.
        • Park C.
        • et al.
        Randomized clinical trial comparing 2 support surfaces: Results of the Prevention of Pressure Ulcers Study.
        Adv Skin Wound Care. 2003; 16: 317-327
        • Tymec A.C.
        • Pieper B.
        • Vollman K.
        A comparison of two pressure-relieving devices on the prevention of heel pressure ulcers.
        Adv Wound Care. 1997; 10: 39-44
        • Van Leen M.
        • Hovius S.
        • Neyens J.
        • et al.
        Pressure relief, cold foam or static air? A single center, prospective, controlled randomized clinical trial in a Dutch nursing home.
        J Tissue Viability. 2011; 20: 30-34
        • Van Leen M.
        • Hovius S.
        • Halfens R.
        • et al.
        Pressure relief with visco-elastic foam or with combined static air overlay? A prospective crossover randomized clinical trial in a Dutch Nursing Home.
        Wounds. 2013; 25: 287-292
        • Vyhlidal S.K.
        • Moxness D.
        • Bosak K.S.
        • et al.
        Mattress replacement or foam overlay? A prospective study on the incidence of pressure ulcers.
        Appl Nurs Res. 1997; 10: 111-120
        • Hampton S.
        Efficacy and cost-effectiveness of the thermo contour mattress.
        Br J Nurs. 1999; 8: 990-996
        • Hughes A.W.
        Prevention of pressure sores in patients with fractures of the femoral neck.
        Injury. 1986; 17: 19-22
        • Cassino R.
        • Ippolito A.M.
        • Cuffaro C.
        • et al.
        A controlled, randomized study on the efficacy of two overlays in the treatment of decubitus ulcers.
        Minerva Chir. 2013; 68: 105-116
        • Keogh A.
        • Dealey C.
        Profiling beds versus standard hospital beds: Effects on pressure ulcer incidence outcomes.
        J Wound Care. 2001; 10: 15-19
        • Ewing M.R.
        • Garrow C.
        • Pressley T.A.
        • et al.
        Further experiences in the use of sheepskins as an aid in nursing.
        Med J Aust. 1964; 2: 139-141
      5. Santy JE, Butler MK, Whyman JD. A comparison study of 6 types of hospital mattresses to determine which most effectively reduces the incidence of pressure sores in elderly patients with hip fractures in a District General Hospital: Report to Northern and Yorkshire Regional Health Authority, 1994.

        • Swain I.
        • Nash R.
        • Robertson J.
        Assessment of support surfaces. Comparison of Nimbus and Pegasus mattresses.
        J Tissue Viability. 1992; 2: 43-45
        • Andrews J.
        • Balai R.
        The prevention and treatment of pressure sores by use of pressure distributing mattresses.
        Decubitus. 1988; 1: 14-21
        • Bird J.C.
        • Look C.
        • Erny S.J.
        Air-fluidized therapy in SNFs.
        Contemp Adm Long Term Care. 1983; 6: 31-34
        • Matsui Y.
        • Miyake S.
        • Kawasaki T.
        • et al.
        Randomized controlled trial of a two layer type air cell mattress in the prevention of pressure ulcers.
        Japan J Pressure Ulcers. 2001; 3: 331-337
        • Schultz A.A.
        Study results: Prediction and prevention of pressure ulcers in surgical patients.
        Adv Wound Care. 1998; 11: 11
        • Bourdel-Marchasson I.
        • Barateau M.
        • Rondeau V.
        • et al.
        A multicenter trial of the effects of oral nutritional supplementation in critically ill older inpatients. GAGE Group. Groupe Aquitain Geriatrique d'Evaluation.
        Nutrition. 2000; 16: 1-5
        • Ek A.C.
        • Unosson M.
        • Larsson J.
        • et al.
        The development and healing of pressure sores related to the nutritional state.
        Clin Nutr. 1991; 10: 245-250
        • Houwing R.
        • Rozendaal M.
        • Wouters-Wesseling W.
        • et al.
        A randomized, double-blind assessment of the effect of nutritional supplementation on the prevention of pressure ulcers in hip-fracture patients.
        Clin Nutr. 2003; 22: 401-405
        • Hartgrink H.H.
        • Wille J.
        • Konig P.
        • et al.
        Pressure sores and tube feeding in patients with a fracture of the hip: A randomized clinical trial.
        Clin Nutr. 1998; 17: 287-292
        • Delmi M.
        • Rapin C.H.
        • Bengoa J.M.
        • et al.
        Dietary supplementation in elderly patients with fractured neck of the femur.
        Lancet. 1990; 335: 1013-1016
        • Bergstrom N.
        • Horn S.D.
        • Rapp M.P.
        • et al.
        Turning for ulcer reduction: A multisite randomized clinical trial in nursing homes.
        J Am Geriatr Soc. 2013; 61: 1705-1713
        • Defloor T.
        • De Bacquer D.
        • Grypdonck M.H.
        The effect of various combinations of turning and pressure reducing devices on the incidence of pressure ulcers.
        Int J Nurs Stud. 2005; 42: 37-46
        • Brown M.M.
        • Boosinger J.
        • Black J.
        • Gaspar T.
        Nursing innovation for prevention of decubitus ulcers in long-term care facilities.
        J Plast Reconstr Surg Nurs. 1981; 1: 51-55
        • Smith A.M.
        • Malone J.A.
        Preventing pressure ulcers in institutionalised elders: Assessing the effects of small, unscheduled shifts in body position.
        Decubitus. 1990; 3: 20-24
        • Moore Z.
        • Cowman S.
        • Conroy R.M.
        A randomized controlled clinical trial of repositioning, using the 30o tilt, for the prevention of pressure ulcers.
        J Clin Nurs. 2011; 20: 2633-2644
        • Young T.
        The 30 degree tilt position vs the 90 degree lateral and supine positions in reducing the incidence of nonblanching erythema in a hospital inpatient population: A randomized controlled trial.
        J Tissue Viability. 2004; 14 (90, 92–96): 88
        • Vanderwee K.
        • Grypdonck M.H.F.
        • De Bacquer D.
        • Defloor T.
        Effectiveness of turning with unequal time intervals on the incidence of pressure ulcer lesions.
        J Adv Nurs. 2007; 57: 59-68
        • Exton-Smith A.N.
        • Sherwin R.W.
        The prevention of pressure sores: Significance of spontaneous bodily movements.
        Lancet. 1961; 2: 1124-1126
        • Bates-Jensen B.M.
        • Alessi C.A.
        • Al-Samarrai N.R.
        • Schnelle J.F.
        The effects of an exercise and incontinence intervention on skin health outcomes in nursing home residents.
        J Am Geriatr Soc. 2003; 51: 348-355
        • Hommel A.
        • Bjorkelund K.B.
        • Thorngren K.G.
        • Ulander K.
        Nutritional status among patients with hip fracture in relation to pressure ulcers.
        Clin Nutr. 2007; 26: 589-596
        • Peich S.
        • Calderon-Margalit R.
        Reduction of nosocomial pressure ulcers in patients with hip fractures: A quality improvement program.
        Int J Health Care Qual Assur Inc Leadersh Health Serv. 2004; 17: 75-80
        • Ameis A.
        • Chiarcossi A.
        • Jimenez J.
        Management of pressure sores. Comparative study in medical and surgical patients.
        Postgrad Med. 1980; 67: 177-184
        • Moody B.L.
        • Fanale J.E.
        • Thompson M.
        • et al.
        Impact of staff education on pressure sore development in elderly hospitalized patients.
        Arch Intern Med. 1988; 148: 2241-2243
        • Moore Z.E.H.
        • Cowman S.
        Risk assessment tools for the prevention of pressure ulcers.
        Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2014; : CD006471
        • Saleh M.
        • Anthony D.
        • Parboteeah S.
        The impact of pressure ulcer risk assessment on patient outcomes among patients.
        J Clin Nurs. 2009; 18: 1923-1929
        • Webster J.
        • Coleman K.
        • Mudge A.
        • et al.
        Pressure ulcers: Effectiveness of risk assessment tools. A randomized controlled trial (the ULCER trial).
        BMJ Qual Saf. 2011; 20: 297-306
        • Vanderwee K.
        • Grypdonck M.
        • Defloor T.
        Nonblanchable erythema as an indicator for the need for pressure ulcer prevention: A randomized controlled trial.
        J Clin Nurs. 2007; 16: 325-335
        • Gunningberg L.
        • Lindholm C.
        • Carlsson M.
        • Sjödén P.O.
        Implementation of risk assessment and classification of pressure ulcers as quality indicators for patients with hip fractures.
        J Clin Nurs. 1999; 8: 396-406
        • Bale S.
        • Finlay I.
        • Harding K.G.
        Pressure sore prevention in a hospice.
        J Wound Care. 1995; 4: 465-468
        • Duimel-Peeters I.G.
        • Halfens J.G.
        • Ambergen A.W.
        • et al.
        The effectiveness of massage with and without dimethyl sulfoxide in preventing pressure ulcers: A randomized, double-blind cross-over trial in patients prone to pressure ulcers.
        Int J Nurs Stud. 2007; 44: 1285-1295
        • Célice J.
        • Fierabras E.
        • Chappon G.
        • Duroux P.
        Traitement des escarres de décubitus des grabataires par les massages in situ. (Treatment of pressure ulcers in the bedridden by massage in situ).
        Thérapie. 1958; 13: 898-900
        • Beeckman D.
        • Matheï C.
        • Van Lancker A.
        • et al.
        A National Guideline for the prevention of pressure ulcers. Good Clinical Practice (GCP).
        Belgian Health Care Knowledge Centre (KCE), Brussels2012 (KCE Reports 193C. D/2013/10.273/97)
        • McInnes E.
        • Jammali-Blasi A.
        • Bell-Syer S.E.M.
        • et al.
        Support surfaces for pressure ulcer prevention.
        Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2011; : CD001735
        • Volkert D.
        • Berner Y.N.
        • Berry E.
        • et al.
        ESPEN guidelines on enteral nutrition: Geriatrics.
        Clin Nutr. 2006; 25: 330-360
        • Langer G.
        • Fink A.
        Nutritional interventions for preventing and treating pressure ulcers.
        Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2014; : CD003216
        • Gillespie B.M.
        • Chaboyer W.P.
        • McInnes E.
        • et al.
        Repositioning for pressure ulcer prevention in adults.
        Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2014; : CD009958