Advertisement
Original Study| Volume 19, ISSUE 6, P541-550, June 2018

Impact of Advanced Practice Registered Nurses on Quality Measures: The Missouri Quality Initiative Experience

Published:December 02, 2017DOI:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jamda.2017.10.014

      Abstract

      Purpose

      The purpose of this article is to review the impact of advanced practice registered nurses (APRNs) on the quality measure (QM) scores of the 16 participating nursing homes of the Missouri Quality Initiative (MOQI) intervention. The MOQI was one of 7 program sites in the US, with specific interventions unique to each site tested for the Centers for Medicaid and Medicare Services Innovations Center. While the goals of the MOQI for long-stay nursing home residents did not specifically include improvement of the QM scores, it was anticipated that improvement most likely would occur. Primary goals of the MOQI were to reduce the frequency of avoidable hospital admissions and readmissions; improve resident health outcomes; improve the process of transitioning between inpatient hospitals and nursing facilities; and reduce overall healthcare spending without restricting access to care or choice of providers.

      Methods

      A 2-group comparison analysis was conducted using statewide QMs; a matched comparison group was selected from facilities in the same counties as the intervention homes, similar baseline QM scores, similar size and ownership. MOQI nursing homes each had an APRN embedded full-time to improve care and help the facility achieve MOQI goals. Part of their clinical work with residents and staff was to focus on quality improvement strategies with potential to influence healthcare outcomes. Trajectories of QM scores for the MOQI intervention nursing homes and matched comparison group homes were tested with nonparametric tests to examine for change in the desired direction between the 2 groups from baseline to 36 months. A composite QM score for each facility was constructed, and baseline to 36-month average change scores were examined using nonparametric tests. Then, adjusting for baseline, a repeated measures analysis using analysis of covariance as conducted.

      Results

      Composite QM scores of the APRN intervention group were significantly better (P = .025) than the comparison group. The repeated measures analysis identified statistically significant group by time interaction (P = .012). Then group comparisons were made at each of the 6-month intervals and statistically significant differences were found at 24 months (P = .042) and 36 months (P = .002), and nearly significant at 30 months (P = .11).

      Implications

      APRNs working full time in nursing homes can positively influence quality of care, and their impact can be measured on improving QMs. As more emphasis is placed on quality and outcomes for nursing home services, providers need to find successful strategies to improve their QMs. Results of these analyses reveal the positive impact on QM outcomes for the majority of the MOQI nursing homes, indicating budgeting for APRN services can be a successful strategy.

      Keywords

      To read this article in full you will need to make a payment

      Purchase one-time access:

      Academic & Personal: 24 hour online accessCorporate R&D Professionals: 24 hour online access
      One-time access price info
      • For academic or personal research use, select 'Academic and Personal'
      • For corporate R&D use, select 'Corporate R&D Professionals'

      Subscribe:

      Subscribe to Journal of the American Medical Directors Association
      Already a print subscriber? Claim online access
      Already an online subscriber? Sign in
      Institutional Access: Sign in to ScienceDirect

      References

        • Futrull M.
        • Melillo K.D.
        Gerontological nurse practitioners: Implications for the future.
        J Gerontol Nurs. 2005; 31: 19-24
        • Kane R.L.
        • Garrard J.
        • Skay C.L.
        • et al.
        Effects of a geriatric nurse practitioner on processed and outcomes of nursing home care.
        Am J Public Health. 1989; 79: 1271-1277
        • Ryden Z.M.
        • Snyder B.
        • Gross M.
        • et al.
        Value-added outcomes; The use of advanced practice nurses in long-term care facilities.
        Gerontologist. 2000; 40: 654-662
        • Bakerjian D.
        Care of nursing home residents by advanced practice nurses: A review of the literature.
        Res Gerontol Nurs. 2008; 1: 1-9
        • Castle N.G.
        • Ferguson J.C.
        What is nursing home quality and how is it measured?.
        Gerontologist. 2010; 50: 426-442
        • Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services
        MDS 3.0 quality measures user’s manual.
        2017 (Accessed November 26, 2017)
        • Rantz M.
        • Alexander G.
        • Galambos C.
        • et al.
        Initiative to test a multidisciplinary model with advanced practice nurses to reduce avoidable hospitalizations among nursing facility residents.
        J Nurs Care Quality. 2014; 29: 1-8
        • Ingber M.J.
        • Feng Z.
        • Khatusky G.
        • et al.
        Initiative to reduced avoidable hospitalizations among nursing facility residents shows promising results.
        Health Affairs. 2017; 36: 441-450
        • Rantz M.J.
        • Popejoy L.
        • Vogelsmeier A.
        • et al.
        Successfully reducing hospitalizations of nursing home residents: Results of the Missouri Quality Initiative.
        J Am Med Direc Assoc. 2017; 18: 960-966
        • Gower J.C.
        • Legendre P.
        Metric and Euclidean properties of dissimilarity coefficients.
        J Classification. 1986; 3: 5-48
        • Zimmerman D.R.
        • Karon S.L.
        • Arling G.
        • et al.
        Development and testing of nursing home quality indicators.
        Health Care Financing Rev. 1995; 16: 107-127
      1. Rantz MJ, Popejoy L, Vogelsmeier A, et al. Lessons learned from MOQI Initiative to reduce avoidable hospitalizations and improve quality in nursing homes with APRNs and interdisciplinary support. Submitted to Journal of Nursing Care Quality. (In press).

        • Ouslander J.G.
        • Bonner A.
        • Herndon L.
        • Shutes J.
        The Interventions to Reduce Acute Care Transfers (INTERACT) quality improvement program: An overview for medical directors and primary care clinicians in long-term care.
        J Am Med Dir Assoc. 2014; 15: 162-170
        • Donald F.
        • Marten-Misener R.
        • Carter N.
        • et al.
        A systematic review of the effectiveness of advanced practice nurses in long-term care.
        J Adv Nurs. 2013; 69: 2148-2161
        • Rantz M.J.
        • Birtley N.M.
        • Flesner M.
        • et al.
        Call to action: APRNs in US nursing homes to improve care and reduce costs.
        Submitted to Nurs Outlook. 2017; 65: 689-696
        • Ingber M.J.
        • Feng Z.
        • Khatutsky G.
        • et al.
        Evaluation of the initiative to reduce avoidable hospitalizations among nursing facility residents: Annual report project year 4.
        (Available at:)
        • Rantz M.J.
        • Hicks L.
        • Grando V.T.
        • et al.
        Nursing home quality, cost, staffing, and staff-mix.
        Gerontologist. 2004; 44: 24-38
        • Hicks L.L.
        • Rantz M.J.
        • Petroski G.F.
        • Mukamel D.B.
        Nursing home costs and quality of care outcomes.
        Nurs Economic. 2004; 224: 178-192
        • Gallagher L.G.
        The High Cost of Poor Care: The Financial Case for Prevention in American Nursing Homes.
        The National Consumer Voice for Quality Long-Term Care, formerly NCCNHR, Washington, DC2001 (Available at: http://theconsumervoice.org/uploads/files/issues/The-High-Cost-of-Poor-Care.pdf; 2001. Accessed November 26, 2017)
        • Weech-Maldonado R.
        • Shea D.
        • Mor V.
        The relationship between quality of care and costs in nursing homes.
        Am J Med Qual. 2006; 21: 40-48