Advertisement
Original Study| Volume 19, ISSUE 7, P623-626, July 2018

Download started.

Ok

Does Cognitive Impairment and Agitation in Dementia Influence Intervention Effectiveness? Findings From a Cluster-Randomized-Controlled Trial With the Therapeutic Robot, PARO

      Abstract

      Objectives

      To explore whether severity of cognitive impairment and agitation of older people with dementia predict outcomes in engagement, mood states, and agitation after a 10-week intervention with the robotic seal, PARO.

      Design

      Data from the PARO intervention-arm of a cluster-randomized controlled trial was used, which involved individual, nonfacilitated, 15-minute sessions with PARO 3 afternoons per week for 10 weeks.

      Sample and participants

      One hundred thirty-eight residents—aged ≥60 years, with dementia—from 9 long-term care facilities.

      Measures

      A series of stepwise multiple linear regressions were conducted. Dependent variables were participants’ levels of engagement, mood states, and agitation at week 10 [assessed by video observation and Cohen Mansfield Agitation Inventory-Short Form (CMAI-SF)]. Predictor variables were baseline levels of cognitive impairment [assessed by Rowland Universal Dementia Assessment Scale (RUDAS)] and agitation (CMAI-SF).

      Results

      Five models were produced. The strongest finding was that participants with more severe agitation at baseline had higher levels of agitation at week 10 (R2 = .82, P < .001). Predictors of positive response were less significant. Low levels of agitation at baseline predicted greater positive behavioral engagement with PARO (R2 = .054, P = .009) and fewer observed instances of agitation (R2 = .033, P = .045) at week 10, whereas greater visual engagement was predicted by both lower levels of agitation and cognitive impairment (R2 = .082, P = .006). Less severe cognitive impairment predicted greater pleasure at week 10 (R2 = .067, P = .004).

      Conclusions/Implications

      Participants with severe agitation had poor response to PARO. Lower levels of agitation and higher cognitive functioning were associated with better responses. In clinical practice, we recommend PARO should be restricted to people with low-moderate severity of agitation. Further research is needed to determine the optimal participant characteristics for response to PARO.

      Keywords

      To read this article in full you will need to make a payment

      Purchase one-time access:

      Academic & Personal: 24 hour online accessCorporate R&D Professionals: 24 hour online access
      One-time access price info
      • For academic or personal research use, select 'Academic and Personal'
      • For corporate R&D use, select 'Corporate R&D Professionals'

      Subscribe:

      Subscribe to Journal of the American Medical Directors Association
      Already a print subscriber? Claim online access
      Already an online subscriber? Sign in
      Institutional Access: Sign in to ScienceDirect

      References

        • Bemelmans R.
        • Gelderblom G.J.
        • Jonker P.
        • et al.
        Effectiveness of robot Paro in intramural psychogeriatric care: A multicenter quasi-experimental study.
        J Am Med Dir Assoc. 2015; 16: 946-950
        • Joranson N.
        • Pedersen I.
        • Rokstad A.M.
        • et al.
        Group activity with Paro in nursing homes: Systematic investigation of behaviors in participants.
        Int Psychogeriatr. 2016; 28: 1345-1354
        • Joranson N.
        • Pedersen I.
        • Rokstad A.M.
        • et al.
        Change in quality of life in older people with dementia participating in Paro-activity: A cluster-randomized controlled trial.
        J Adv Nurs. 2016; 72: 3020-3033
        • Thodberg K.
        • Sørensen L.U.
        • Videbech P.B.
        • et al.
        Behavioral responses of nursing home residents to visits from a person with a dog, a robot seal or a toy cat.
        Anthrozoös. 2016; 29: 107-121
        • Moyle W.
        • Jones C.
        • Murfield J.
        • et al.
        Use of a robotic seal as a therapeutic tool to improve dementia symptoms: a cluster-randomised controlled trial.
        J Am Med Dir Assoc. 2017; 18: 766-773
        • Cohen-Mansfield J.
        Use of patient characteristics to determine nonpharmacologic interventions for behavioral and psychological symptoms of dementia.
        Int Psychogeriatr. 2000; 12: 373-380
        • Hsu T.J.
        • Tsai H.T.
        • Hwang A.C.
        • et al.
        Predictors of non-pharmacological intervention effect on cognitive function and behavioral and psychological symptoms of older people with dementia.
        Geriatr Gerontol Int. 2017; 17: 28-35
        • Smit D.
        • de Lange J.
        • Willemse B.
        • et al.
        Predictors of activity involvement in dementia care homes: A cross-sectional study.
        BMC Geriatr. 2017; 17: 175
        • van der Ploeg E.S.
        • Eppingstall B.
        • Camp C.J.
        • et al.
        Personalized one-to-one intervention in agitated individuals with dementia: Responders versus non-responders.
        J Gerontol Nurs. 2015; 41: 22-29
        • Van Mierlo L.D.
        • Van der Roest H.G.
        • Meiland F.J.
        • et al.
        Personalized dementia care: Proven effectiveness of psychosocial interventions in subgroups.
        Ageing Res Rev. 2010; 9: 163-183
        • Moyle W.
        • Beattie E.
        • Draper B.
        • et al.
        Effect of an interactive therapeutic robotic animal on engagement, mood states, agitation and psychotrophic drug use in people with dementia: a cluster-randomized controlled trial protocol.
        BMJ Open. 2015; 5: e009097
        • Mervin M.C.
        • Moyle W.
        • Jones C.
        • et al.
        The cost-effectiveness of using PARO, a therapeutic robotic seal, to reduce agitation and medication use in dementia: findings from a cluster randomized-controlled trial.
        J Am Med Dir Assoc. 2018; 19: 619-622
        • Jones C.
        • Sung B.
        • Moyle W.
        Assessing engagement in people with dementia: A new approach to assessment using video analysis.
        Arch Psychiatr Nurs. 2015; 29: 377-382
        • Werner P.
        • Cohen-Mansfield J.
        • Koroknay V.
        • et al.
        The impact of a restraint-reduction program on nursing home residents.
        Geriatric Nursing. 1994; 15: 142-146
        • Rowland J.T.
        • Basic D.
        • Storey J.E.
        • et al.
        The Rowland Universal Dementia Assessment Scale (RUDAS) and the Folstein MMSE in a multicultural cohort of elderly persons.
        Int Psychogeriatr. 2006; 18: 111-120
        • Moyle W.
        • Jones C.
        • Murfield J.
        • et al.
        Using a therapeutic companion robot for dementia symptoms in long-term care: reflections from a cluster-RCT.
        Aging Ment Health. 2017; : 1-8
        • Moyle W.
        • Bramble M.
        • Jones C.
        • et al.
        Care staff perceptions of a social robot called paro and a look-alike plush toy: a descriptive qualitative approach.
        Aging Ment Health. 2018; 22: 330-335
        • Moyle W.
        • Bramble M.
        • Jones C.J.
        • et al.
        “She Had a Smile on Her Face as Wide as the Great Australian Bite”: A Qualitative Examination of Family Perceptions of a Therapeutic Robot and a Plush Toy.
        Gerontologist. 2017 Nov 19; ([Epub ahead of print])
        • Moyle W.
        • Jones C.
        • Murfield J.
        • et al.
        Effect of a robotic seal on the motor activity and sleep patterns of older people with dementia, as measured by wearable technology: A cluster-randomised controlled trial.
        Maturitas. 2018; 110: 10-17