Review Article| Volume 19, ISSUE 10, P840-845, October 2018

Effects of Geriatric Team Rehabilitation After Hip Fracture: Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials



      Systematic rehabilitation by geriatric interdisciplinary teams has been associated with favorable outcomes in frail older patients. The aim of the present meta-analysis was to evaluate the effects of interdisciplinary geriatric team rehabilitation in older patients with hip fracture.

      Design, setting, and participants

      Randomized controlled trials involving participants sustaining hip fractures at the age of 65 years or older were included. Included trials evaluated effects of interdisciplinary geriatric team rehabilitation compared with usual postoperative care and reported on at least one of the following outcomes: activities of daily living (ADLs), physical function, mobility, depression, cognitive function, discharge to home, quality of life, influence on relatives, complications, and survival. Seven studies of at least moderate quality with a total of 1763 participants were included.


      Data were combined using a random-effects model. The GRADE system (1–4, where 4 is highest level of evidence) was used to rate the quality of the estimates.


      Outcomes were grouped into 4 categories, each of which was reported on in at least 4 studies: ADL/physical function, mobility, living in one's own home, and survival. Interdisciplinary geriatric team rehabilitation increased ADL/physical function (standardized mean difference [SMD], 0.32; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.17–0.47) and mobility (SMD, 0.32; 95% CI, 0.12–0.52) compared with conventional care. In contrast, interdisciplinary geriatric team rehabilitation did not increase the chance of living in one's own home after discharge (risk ratio [RR], 1.07; 95% CI, 0.99–1.16) or survival (RR, 1.02; 95% CI, 0.99–1.06) compared with conventional care. All results were rated as GRADE 3.


      Systematic rehabilitation by geriatric interdisciplinary teams increases physical function and mobility significantly compared with conventional care in patients with hip fracture. In contrast, the chance of being discharged to one's own home and survival are not influenced.


      To read this article in full you will need to make a payment

      Purchase one-time access:

      Academic & Personal: 24 hour online accessCorporate R&D Professionals: 24 hour online access
      One-time access price info
      • For academic or personal research use, select 'Academic and Personal'
      • For corporate R&D use, select 'Corporate R&D Professionals'


      Subscribe to Journal of the American Medical Directors Association
      Already a print subscriber? Claim online access
      Already an online subscriber? Sign in
      Institutional Access: Sign in to ScienceDirect


        • Johnell O.
        • Kanis J.A.
        An estimate of the worldwide prevalence and disability associated with osteoporotic fractures.
        Osteoporos Int. 2006; 17: 1726-1733
        • Piscitelli P.
        • Iolascon G.
        • Argentiero A.
        • et al.
        Incidence and costs of hip fractures vs strokes and acute myocardial infarction in Italy: Comparative analysis based on national hospitalization records.
        Clin Interv Aging. 2012; 7: 575-583
        • Gullberg B.
        • Johnell O.
        • Kanis J.A.
        World-wide projections for hip fracture.
        Osteoporos Int. 1997; 7: 407-413
        • Nordstrom P.
        • Gustafson Y.
        • Michaelsson K.
        • Nordstrom A.
        Length of hospital stay after hip fracture and short term risk of death after discharge: A total cohort study in Sweden.
        BMJ. 2015; 350: h696
        • Roberts S.E.
        • Goldacre M.J.
        Time trends and demography of mortality after fractured neck of femur in an English population, 1968–98: Database study.
        BMJ. 2003; 327: 771-775
        • Moran A.E.
        • Forouzanfar M.H.
        • Roth G.A.
        • et al.
        The global burden of ischemic heart disease in 1990 and 2010: The Global Burden of Disease 2010 study.
        Circulation. 2014; 129: 1493-1501
        • Nichols M.
        • Townsend N.
        • Scarborough P.
        • Rayner M.
        Cardiovascular disease in Europe 2014: Epidemiological update.
        Eur Heart J. 2014; 35: 2929
        • Roche J.J.
        • Wenn R.T.
        • Sahota O.
        • Moran C.G.
        Effect of comorbidities and postoperative complications on mortality after hip fracture in elderly people: Prospective observational cohort study.
        BMJ. 2005; 331: 1374
        • da Costa J.A.
        • Ribeiro A.
        • Bogas M.
        • et al.
        Mortality and functional impairment after hip fracture—a prospective study in a Portuguese population.
        Acta Reumatol Port. 2009; 34: 618-626
        • Dyer S.M.
        • Crotty M.
        • Fairhall N.
        • et al.
        A critical review of the long-term disability outcomes following hip fracture.
        BMC Geriatr. 2016; 16: 158
        • Rubenstein L.Z.
        • Stuck A.E.
        • Siu A.L.
        • Wieland D.
        Impacts of geriatric evaluation and management programs on defined outcomes: Overview of the evidence.
        J Am Geriatr Soc. 1991; 39 ([discussion: 7S–8S]): 8S-16S
        • Stuck A.E.
        • Siu A.L.
        • Wieland G.D.
        • et al.
        Comprehensive geriatric assessment: A meta-analysis of controlled trials.
        Lancet. 1993; 342: 1032-1036
        • Bachmann S.
        • Finger C.
        • Huss A.
        • et al.
        Inpatient rehabilitation specifically designed for geriatric patients: Systematic review and meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials.
        BMJ. 2010; 340: c1718
        • Handoll H.H.
        • Cameron I.D.
        • Mak J.C.
        • Finnegan T.P.
        Multidisciplinary rehabilitation for older people with hip fractures.
        Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2009; : CD007125
        • Whitehead A.
        • Bailey A.J.
        • Elbourne D.
        Combining summaries of binary outcomes with those of continuous outcomes in a meta-analysis.
        J Biopharm Stat. 1999; 9: 1-16
        • Deeks J.J.
        • Higgins J.P.T.
        Statistical Algorithms in Review Manager 5.
        • Gonzalez-Montalvo J.I.
        • Alarcon T.
        • Mauleon J.L.
        • et al.
        The orthogeriatric unit for acute patients: A new model of care that improves efficiency in the management of patients with hip fracture.
        Hip Int. 2010; 20: 229-235
        • Huusko T.M.
        • Karppi P.
        • Avikainen V.
        • et al.
        Randomised, clinically controlled trial of intensive geriatric rehabilitation in patients with hip fracture: Subgroup analysis of patients with dementia.
        BMJ. 2000; 321: 1107-1111
        • Naglie G.
        • Tansey C.
        • Kirkland J.L.
        • et al.
        Interdisciplinary inpatient care for elderly people with hip fracture: A randomized controlled trial.
        CMAJ. 2002; 167: 25-32
        • Stenvall M.
        • Olofsson B.
        • Lundstrom M.
        • et al.
        A multidisciplinary, multifactorial intervention program reduces postoperative falls and injuries after femoral neck fracture.
        Osteoporos Int. 2007; 18: 167-175
        • Prestmo A.
        • Hagen G.
        • Sletvold O.
        • et al.
        Comprehensive geriatric care for patients with hip fractures: A prospective, randomised, controlled trial.
        Lancet. 2015; 385: 1623-1633
        • Vidan M.
        • Serra J.A.
        • Moreno C.
        • et al.
        Efficacy of a comprehensive geriatric intervention in older patients hospitalized for hip fracture: A randomized, controlled trial.
        J Am Geriatr Soc. 2005; 53: 1476-1482
        • Ziden L.
        • Kreuter M.
        • Frandin K.
        Long-term effects of home rehabilitation after hip fracture—1-year follow-up of functioning, balance confidence, and health-related quality of life in elderly people.
        Disabil Rehabil. 2010; 32: 18-32
        • Cohen J.
        Statistical Power Analysis for the Behavioral Sciences.
        Routledge Academic, New York, NY1988
        • Robinson S.M.
        • Ni Bhuachalla B.
        • Ni Mhaille B.
        • et al.
        Home, please: A conjoint analysis of patient preferences after a bad hip fracture.
        Geriatr Gerontol Int. 2015; 15: 1165-1170
        • Ellis G.
        • Whitehead M.A.
        • Robinson D.
        • et al.
        Comprehensive geriatric assessment for older adults admitted to hospital: Meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials.
        BMJ. 2011; 343: d6553
        • Diong J.
        • Allen N.
        • Sherrington C.
        Structured exercise improves mobility after hip fracture: A meta-analysis with meta-regression.
        Br J Sports Med. 2016; 50: 346-355
        • Wang H.
        • Li C.
        • Zhang Y.
        • et al.
        The influence of inpatient comprehensive geriatric care on elderly patients with hip fractures: A meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.
        Int J Clin Exp Med. 2015; 8: 19815-19830