Article in Press
Response to Resolution A19 Regarding “Stopping Eating and Drinking by Advance Directives”
Ladislav Volicer, MD, PhD
School of Aging Studies, University of South Florida, Tampa, FL
Thaddeus Mason Pope, JD, PhD
Health Law Institute, Mitchell Hamline School of Law, Saint Paul, MN
Karl E. Steinberg, MD, CMD, HMDC
Stone Mountain Medical Associates, Inc, Oceanside, CA
Stanley A. Terman, PhD, MD
Caring Advocates, Effective Living Wills for Dementia, Etc, San Francisco, CA
Article Info
Publication History
Published online: May 31, 2019
To view the full text, please login as a subscribed user or purchase a subscription. Click here to view the full text on ScienceDirect.
In March 2019, the Society for Post-Acute and Long-Term Care Medicine's (AMDA's) House of Delegates adopted Resolution A19 as policy, which AMDA's Ethics Committee had proposed.1 We appreciate their effort to address a difficult issue. But we disagree both with their categorical rejection of “Stopping Eating and Drinking by Advanced Directives” (SED by AD) and with their categorical insistence that feeding must continue for all advanced dementia patients until their behavior manifests refusal or distress.
To access this article, please choose from the options below
Purchase access to this article
Claim Access
If you are a current subscriber with Society Membership or an Account Number, claim your access now.
Subscribe to this title
Purchase a subscription to gain access to this and all other articles in this journal.
Institutional Access
Visit ScienceDirect to see if you have access via your institution.
© 2019 Published by Elsevier Inc. on behalf of AMDA - The Society for Post-Acute and Long-Term Care Medicine.
Access this article on
Visit ScienceDirect to see if you have access via your institution.
Related Articles
Searching for related articles..






