Advertisement
Original Study| Volume 21, ISSUE 4, P525-530.e4, April 2020

Download started.

Ok

Measurement of Dynamical Resilience Indicators Improves the Prediction of Recovery Following Hospitalization in Older Adults

Published:December 10, 2019DOI:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jamda.2019.10.011

      Abstract

      Objectives

      Acute illnesses and subsequent hospital admissions present large health stressors to older adults, after which their recovery is variable. The concept of physical resilience offers opportunities to develop dynamical tools to predict an individual's recovery potential. This study aimed to investigate if dynamical resilience indicators based on repeated physical and mental measurements in acutely hospitalized geriatric patients have added value over single baseline measurements in predicting favorable recovery.

      Design

      Intensive longitudinal study.

      Setting and Participants

      121 patients (aged 84.3 ± 6.2 years, 60% female) admitted to the geriatric ward for acute illness.

      Measurements

      In addition to preadmission characteristics (frailty, multimorbidity), in-hospital heart rate and physical activity were continuously monitored with a wearable sensor. Momentary well-being (life satisfaction, anxiety, discomfort) was measured by experience sampling 4 times per day. The added value of dynamical indicators of resilience was investigated for predicting recovery at hospital discharge and 3 months later.

      Results

      31% of participants satisfied the criteria of good recovery at hospital discharge and 50% after 3 months. A combination of a frailty index, multimorbidity, Clinical Frailty Scale, and or gait speed predicted good recovery reasonably well on the short term [area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC) = 0.79], but only moderately after 3 months (AUC = 0.70). On addition of dynamical resilience indicators, the AUC for predicting good 3-month recovery increased to 0.79 (P = .03). Variability in life satisfaction and anxiety during the hospital stay were independent predictors of good 3-month recovery [odds ratio (OR) = 0.24, P = .01, and OR = 0.54, P = .04, respectively].

      Conclusions and Implications

      These results highlight that measurements capturing the dynamic functioning of multiple physiological systems have added value in assessing physical resilience in clinical practice, especially those monitoring mental responses. Improved monitoring and prediction of physical resilience could help target intensive treatment options and subsequent geriatric rehabilitation to patients who will most likely benefit from them.

      Keywords

      To read this article in full you will need to make a payment

      Purchase one-time access:

      Academic & Personal: 24 hour online accessCorporate R&D Professionals: 24 hour online access
      One-time access price info
      • For academic or personal research use, select 'Academic and Personal'
      • For corporate R&D use, select 'Corporate R&D Professionals'

      Subscribe:

      Subscribe to Journal of the American Medical Directors Association
      Already a print subscriber? Claim online access
      Already an online subscriber? Sign in
      Institutional Access: Sign in to ScienceDirect

      References

        • No authors listed (Editorial)
        What is health? The ability to adapt.
        Lancet. 2009; 373: 781
        • Kuchel G.A.
        Function begets function and resilience in old age: Is precision gerontology possible?.
        J Am Geriatr Soc. 2017; 65: 1141-1144
        • Whitson H.E.
        • Duan-Porter W.D.
        • Schmader K.E.
        • et al.
        Physical resilience in older adults: Systematic review and development of an emerging construct.
        J Gerontol A Biol Sci Med Sci. 2015; 71: 489-495
        • Whitson H.E.
        • Cohen H.J.
        • Schmader K.E.
        • et al.
        Physical resilience: Not simply the opposite of frailty.
        J Am Geriatr Soc. 2018; 66: 1459-1461
        • De Alfieri W.
        • Borgogni T.
        Through the looking glass and what frailty found there: Looking for resilience in older adults.
        J Am Geriatr Soc. 2010; 58: 602-619
        • Hadley E.C.
        • Kuchel G.A.
        • Newman A.B.
        Report: NIA workshop on measures of physiologic resiliencies in human aging.
        J Gerontol A Biol Sci Med Sci. 2017; 72: 980-990
        • Russo S.J.
        • Murrough J.W.
        • Han M.
        • et al.
        Neurobiology of resilience.
        Nat Neurosci. 2012; 15: 1475-1484
        • Varadhan R.
        • Seplaki C.L.
        • Xue Q.L.
        • et al.
        Stimulus-response paradigm for characterizing the loss of resilience in homeostatic regulation associated with frailty.
        Mech Ageing Dev. 2008; 129: 666-670
        • Kalisch R.
        • Baker D.G.
        • Basten U.
        • et al.
        The resilience framework as a strategy to combat stress-related disorders.
        Nat Hum Behav. 2017; 1: 784-790
        • Varadhan R.
        • Walston J.D.
        • Bandeen-Roche K.
        Can a link be found between physical resilience and frailty in older adults by studying dynamical systems?.
        J Am Geriatr Soc. 2018; 66: 1455-1458
        • Gijzel S.M.W.
        • Whitson H.E.
        • van de Leemput I.A.
        • et al.
        Resilience in clinical care: Getting a grip on the recovery potential of older adults.
        J Am Geriatr Soc. 2019; 67: 2650-2657
        • Cosco T.D.
        • Kaushal A.
        • Hardy R.
        • et al.
        Operationalising resilience in longitudinal studies: A systematic review of methodological approaches.
        J Epidemiol Community Health. 2017; 71: 98-104
        • Ram N.
        • Conroy D.E.
        • Pincus A.L.
        • et al.
        Examining the interplay of processes across multiple time-scales: Illustration with the intraindividual study of affect, health, and interpersonal behavior (iSAHIB).
        Res Hum Dev. 2014; 11: 142-160
        • Nelson B.
        • McGorry P.D.
        • Wichers M.
        • et al.
        Moving from static to dynamic models of the onset of mental disorder: A review.
        JAMA Psychiatry. 2017; 74: 528-534
        • Montpetit M.A.
        • Bergeman C.S.
        • Deboeck P.R.
        • et al.
        Resilience-as-process: Negative affect, stress, and coupled dynamical systems.
        Psychol Aging. 2010; 25: 631-640
        • Wichers M.
        • Wigman J.T.W.
        • Myin-Germeys I.
        Micro-level affect dynamics in psychopathology viewed from complex dynamical system theory.
        Emotion Review. 2015; 7: 362-367
        • Hamaker E.L.
        • Nesselroade J.R.
        • Molenaar P.C.M.
        The integrated trait–state model.
        J Res Pers. 2007; 41: 295-315
        • Lutomski J.E.
        • Baars M.A.
        • Van Kempen J.A.
        • et al.
        Validation of a frailty index from the older persons and informal caregivers survey minimum data set.
        J Am Geriatr Soc. 2013; 61: 1625-1627
        • Lutomski J.E.
        • Baars M.A.E.
        • Schalk B.W.M.
        • et al.
        The development of The Older Persons and Informal Caregivers Survey Minimum DataSet (TOPICS- MDS): A large-scale data sharing initiative.
        PLoS One. 2013; 8: e81673
        • Rabin R.
        • de Charro F.
        EQ-5D: A measure of health status from the EuroQol Group.
        Ann Med. 2001; 33: 337-343
        • International Wellbeing Group
        Personal Wellbeing Index.
        5th ed. Australian Centre on Quality of Life, Deakin University, Melbourne, Australia2013
        • Wagnild G.
        • Young H.M.
        Development and psychometric evaluation of the Resilience Scale.
        J Nurs Meas. 1993; 1: 165-178
        • Rockwood K.
        • Song X.
        • MacKnight C.
        • et al.
        A global clinical measure of fitness and frailty in elderly people.
        CMAJ. 2005; 173: 489-495
        • Breteler M.J.M.
        • Huizinga E.
        • van Loon K.
        • et al.
        Reliability of wireless monitoring using a wearable patch sensor in high-risk surgical patients at a step-down unit in the Netherlands: A clinical validation study.
        BMJ Open. 2018; 8: e020162
        • Myin-Germeys I.
        • Oorschot M.
        • Collip D.
        • et al.
        Experience sampling research in psychopathology: Opening the black box of daily life.
        Psychol Med. 2009; 39: 1533-1547
        • Marteau T.M.
        • Bekker H.
        The development of a six-item short-form of the state scale of the Spielberger State-Trait Anxiety Inventory (STAI).
        Br J Clin Psychol. 1992; 31: 301-306
        • Bursac Z.
        • Gauss C.H.
        • Williams D.K.
        • Hosmer D.W.
        Purposeful selection of variables in logistic regression.
        Source Code Biol Med. 2008; 3: 17
        • Landgrebe T.C.W.
        • Duin R.P.W.
        Approximating the multiclass ROC by pairwise analysis.
        Pattern Recognit Lett. 2007; 28: 1747-1758
        • El Khouli R.H.
        • Macura K.J.
        • Barker P.B.
        • et al.
        Relationship of temporal resolution to diagnostic performance for dynamic contrast enhanced MRI of the breast.
        J Magn Reson Imag. 2009; 30: 999-1004
        • Rockwood K.
        • Mitnitski A.
        Resilience and frailty: Further steps, best taken together.
        Eur Geriatr Med. 2015; 6: 405-407
        • Stolz E.
        • Mayerl H.
        • Freidl W.
        Fluctuations in frailty among older adults.
        Age Ageing. 2019; 48: 547-552
        • Santa Mina D.
        • Alibhai S.M.H.
        Prehabilitation in geriatric oncology.
        J Geriatr Oncol. 2019; ([Epub ahead of print])
        • Cook D.J.
        • Thompson J.E.
        • Prinsen S.K.
        • et al.
        Functional recovery in the elderly after major surgery: Assessment of mobility recovery using wireless technology.
        Ann Thorac Surg. 2013; 96: 1057-1061
        • Cummins R.A.
        Caregivers as managers of subjective wellbeing: A homeostatic perspective.
        J Appl Res Intellect Disabil. 2005; 18: 335-344
        • Yu J.
        • Yu Y.
        Continuing care needs for patients with generalized anxiety after hospital discharge.
        Neuropsychiatry. 2017; 7: 494-500
        • Windt J.
        • Ardern C.L.
        • Gabbett T.J.
        • et al.
        Getting the most out of intensive longitudinal data: A methodological review of workload-injury studies.
        BMJ Open. 2018; 8: e022626
        • Ram N.
        • Gerstorf D.
        Time-structured and net intraindividual variability: Tools for examining the development of dynamic characteristics and processes.
        Psychol Aging. 2009; 24: 778-791
        • Gijzel S.M.W.
        • Van de Leemput I.A.
        • Scheffer M.
        • et al.
        Dynamical resilience indicators in time series of self-rated health correspond to frailty levels in older adults.
        J Gerontol A Biol Sci Med Sci. 2017; 72: 991-996
        • van de Leemput I.A.
        • Wichers M.
        • Cramer A.O.
        • et al.
        Critical slowing down as early warning for the onset and termination of depression.
        Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2014; 111: 87-92
        • Gijzel S.M.W.
        • van de Leemput I.A.
        • Scheffer M.
        • et al.
        Dynamical indicators of resilience in postural balance time series are related to successful aging in high-functioning older adults.
        J Gerontol A Biol Sci Med Sci. 2019; 74: 1119-1126
        • Olde Rikkert M.G.M.
        • Dakos V.
        • Buchman T.G.
        • et al.
        Slowing down of recovery as generic risk marker for acute severity transitions in chronic diseases.
        Crit Care Med. 2016; 44: 601-606

      References

        • Lutomski J.E.
        • Baars M.A.E.
        • Schalk B.W.M.
        • et al.
        The development of The Older Persons and Informal Caregivers Survey Minimum DataSet (TOPICS- MDS): A large-scale data sharing initiative.
        PLoS One. 2013; 8: e81673
        • Rabin R.
        • de Charro F.
        EQ-5D: A measure of health status from the EuroQol Group.
        Ann Med. 2001; 33: 337-343
        • International Wellbeing Group
        Australian Centre on Quality of Life.
        Personal Wellbeing Index. 5th Ed. Deakin University, Melbourne, Australia2013
        • Wagnild G.
        • Young H.M.
        Development and psychometric evaluation of the Resilience Scale.
        J Nurs Meas. 1993; 1: 165-178
        • Rockwood K.
        • Song X.
        • MacKnight C.
        • et al.
        A global clinical measure of fitness and frailty in elderly people.
        CMAJ. 2005; 173: 489-495
        • Peel N.M.
        • Kuys S.S.
        • Klein K.
        Gait speed as a measure in geriatric assessment in clinical settings: A systematic review.
        J Gerontol A Biol Sci Med Sci. 2013; 68: 39-46
        • Chen K.Y.
        • Bassett D.R.
        The technology of accelerometry-based activity monitors: Current and future.
        Med Sci Sports Exerc. 2005; 37: s490-s500