Advertisement
Original Study| Volume 22, ISSUE 2, P380-387, February 2021

Download started.

Ok

Predicting Falls in Nursing Homes: A Prospective Multicenter Cohort Study Comparing Fall History, Staff Clinical Judgment, the Care Home Falls Screen, and the Fall Risk Classification Algorithm

Published:August 17, 2020DOI:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jamda.2020.06.037

      Abstract

      Objectives

      To evaluate and compare the predictive accuracy of fall history, staff clinical judgment, the Care Home Falls Screen (CaHFRiS), and the Fall Risk Classification Algorithm (FRiCA).

      Design

      Prospective multicenter cohort study with 6 months' follow-up.

      Setting and Participants

      A total of 420 residents from 15 nursing homes participated.

      Methods

      Fall history, clinical judgment of staff (ie, physiotherapists, nurses and nurses' aides), and the CaHFRiS and FRiCA were assessed at baseline, and falls were documented in the follow-up period. Predictive accuracy was calculated at 1, 3, and 6 months by means of sensitivity, specificity, positive and negative predictive value, positive and negative likelihood ratio, Youden Index, and overall accuracy.

      Results

      In total, 658 falls occurred and 50.2% of the residents had at least 1 fall with an average fall rate of 1.57 (SD 2.78, range 0-20) per resident. The overall accuracy for all screening methods at all measuring points ranged from 54.8% to 66.5%. Fall history, FRiCA, and a CaHFRiS score of ≥4 had better sensitivity, ranging from 64.4% to 80.8%, compared with the clinical judgment of all disciplines (sensitivity ranging from 47.4% to 71.2%). The negative predictive value (ranging from 92.9% at 1 month to 59.6% at 6 months) had higher scores for fall history, FRiCA, and a CaHFRiS score of ≥4. Specificity ranged from 50.3% at 1 month to 77.5% at 6 months, with better specificity for clinical judgment of physiotherapists and worse specificity for FRiCA. Positive predictive value ranged from 22.2% (clinical judgment of nurses' aides) at 1 month to 67.8% at 6 months (clinical judgment of physiotherapists).

      Conclusions and Implications

      No strong recommendations can be made for the use of any screening method. More research on identifying residents with the highest fall risk is crucial, as these residents benefit the most from multifactorial assessments and subsequent tailored interventions.

      Keywords

      To read this article in full you will need to make a payment

      Purchase one-time access:

      Academic & Personal: 24 hour online accessCorporate R&D Professionals: 24 hour online access
      One-time access price info
      • For academic or personal research use, select 'Academic and Personal'
      • For corporate R&D use, select 'Corporate R&D Professionals'

      Subscribe:

      Subscribe to Journal of the American Medical Directors Association
      Already a print subscriber? Claim online access
      Already an online subscriber? Sign in
      Institutional Access: Sign in to ScienceDirect

      References

        • World Health Organization
        WHO global report on falls prevention in older age.
        (Available at:) (Accessed February 2, 20720)
        • Burns E.R.
        • Stevens J.A.
        • Lee R.
        The direct costs of fatal and non-fatal falls among older adults—United States.
        J Safety Res. 2016; 58: 99-103
      1. Fall prevention.
        (Available at:)
      2. WISQARS.
        (Available at:)
        http://webappa.cdc.gov/cgi-bin/broker.exe
        Date accessed: October 5, 2015
        • Vlaeyen E.
        • Coussement J.
        • Leysens G.
        • et al.
        Characteristics and effectiveness of fall prevention programs in nursing homes: A systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.
        J Am Geriatr Soc. 2015; 63: 211-221
        • Cameron I.D.
        • Dyer S.M.
        • Panagoda C.E.
        • et al.
        Interventions for preventing falls in older people in care facilities and hospitals.
        Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2018; : CD005465
        • Close J.C.
        • Lord S.R.
        Fall assessment in older people.
        BMJ. 2011; 343: d5153
        • Sorensen S.V.
        • de Lissovoy G.
        • Kunaprayoon D.
        • et al.
        A taxonomy and economic consequences of nursing home falls.
        Drugs Aging. 2006; 23: 251-262
        • Becker C.
        • Rapp K.
        Fall prevention in nursing homes.
        Clin Geriatr Med. 2010; 26: 693-704
        • Lamb S.E.
        • Becker C.
        • Gillespie L.D.
        • et al.
        Reporting of complex interventions in clinical trials: Development of a taxonomy to classify and describe fall-prevention interventions.
        Trials. 2011; 12: 125
        • Vlaeyen E.
        • Stas J.
        • Leysens G.
        • et al.
        Implementation of fall prevention in residential care facilities: A systematic review of barriers and facilitators.
        Int J Nurs Stud. 2017; 70: 110-121
        • Nunan S.
        • Brown Wilson C.
        • Henwood T.
        • Parker D.
        Fall risk assessment tools for use among older adults in long-term care settings: A systematic review of the literature.
        Australas J Ageing. 2018; 37: 23-33
        • Kehinde J.O.
        Instruments for measuring fall risk in older adults living in long-term care facilities: An integrative review.
        J Gerontol Nurs. 2009; 35: 46-55
        • Scott V.
        • Votova K.
        • Scanlan A.
        • Close J.
        Multifactorial and functional mobility assessment tools for fall risk among older adults in community, home-support, long-term and acute care settings.
        Age Ageing. 2007; 36: 130-139
        • Wagner L.M.
        • Scott V.
        • Silver M.
        Current approaches to fall risk assessment in nursing homes.
        Geriatr Nurs. 2011; 32: 238-244
        • Lee J.
        • Geller A.I.
        • Strasser D.C.
        Analytical review: Focus on fall screening assessments.
        PM R. 2013; 5: 609-621
        • Whitney J.
        • Close J.C.
        • Lord S.R.
        • Jackson S.H.
        Identification of high risk fallers among older people living in residential care facilities: A simple screen based on easily collectable measures.
        Arch Gerontol Geriatr. 2012; 55: 690-695
        • Delbaere K.
        • Close J.C.
        • Menz H.B.
        • et al.
        Development and validation of fall risk screening tools for use in residential aged care facilities.
        Med J Aust. 2008; 189: 193-196
        • Gates S.
        • Fisher J.D.
        • Cooke M.W.
        • et al.
        Multifactorial assessment and targeted intervention for preventing falls and injuries among older people in community and emergency care settings: Systematic review and meta-analysis.
        BMJ. 2008; 336: 130-133
        • Nordin E.
        • Lindelof N.
        • Rosendahl E.
        • et al.
        Prognostic validity of the Timed Up-and-Go test, a modified Get-Up-and-Go test, staff's global judgement and fall history in evaluating fall risk in residential care facilities.
        Age Ageing. 2008; 37: 442-448
        • Meyer G.
        • Kopke S.
        • Haastert B.
        • Muhlhauser I.
        Comparison of a fall risk assessment tool with nurses' judgement alone: A cluster-randomised controlled trial.
        Age Ageing. 2009; 38: 417-423
        • von Elm E.
        • Altman D.G.
        • Egger M.
        • et al.
        The Strengthening the Reporting of Observational Studies in Epidemiology (STROBE) Statement: Guidelines for reporting observational studies.
        Int J Surg. 2014; 12: 1495-1499
        • Lamb S.E.
        • Jorstad-Stein E.C.
        • Hauer K.
        • et al.
        Development of a common outcome data set for fall injury prevention trials: The Prevention of Falls Network Europe consensus.
        J Am Geriatr Soc. 2005; 53: 1618-1622
        • Katz S.
        • Ford A.B.
        • Moskowitz R.W.
        • et al.
        Studies of illness in the aged. The Index of ADL: A standardized measure of biological and psychosocial function.
        JAMA. 1963; 185: 914-919
        • Cha E.S.
        • Kim K.H.
        • Erlen J.A.
        Translation of scales in cross-cultural research: Issues and techniques.
        J Adv Nurs. 2007; 58: 386-395
        • Maneesriwongul W.
        • Dixon J.K.
        Instrument translation process: A methods review.
        J Adv Nurs. 2004; 48: 175-186
        • Cuesta-Vargas A.I.
        • Gabel C.P.
        Validation of a Spanish version of the Spine Functional Index.
        Health Qual Life Outcomes. 2014; 12: 96
        • Zhu K.
        • Devine A.
        • Lewis J.R.
        • et al.
        “Timed up and go” test and bone mineral density measurement for fracture prediction.
        Arch Intern Med. 2011; 171: 1655-1661
        • Folstein M.F.
        • Folstein S.E.
        • McHugh P.R.
        “Mini-mental state”: A practical method for grading the cognitive state of patients for the clinician.
        J Psychiatr Res. 1975; 12: 189-198
        • Altman D.
        Practical Statistics for Medical Research.
        Chapman and Hall, London1991
        • Perell K.L.
        • Nelson A.
        • Goldman R.L.
        • et al.
        Fall risk assessment measures: An analytic review.
        J Gerontol A Biol Sci Med Sci. 2001; 56: M761-M766
        • Oliver D.
        • Daly F.
        • Martin F.C.
        • McMurdo M.E.
        Risk factors and risk assessment tools for falls in hospital in-patients: A systematic review.
        Age Ageing. 2004; 33: 122-130
        • O'Loughlin J.L.
        • Robitaille Y.
        • Boivin J.F.
        • Suissa S.
        Incidence of and risk factors for falls and injurious falls among the community-dwelling elderly.
        Am J Epidemiol. 1993; 137: 342-354
        • Tinetti M.E.
        • Kumar C.
        The patient who falls: “It's always a trade-off”.
        JAMA. 2010; 303: 258-266
        • Deandrea S.
        • Bravi F.
        • Turati F.
        • et al.
        Risk factors for falls in older people in nursing homes and hospitals. A systematic review and meta-analysis.
        Arch Gerontol Geriatr. 2013; 56: 407-415
        • Lundin-Olsson L.
        • Jensen J.
        • Nyberg L.
        • Gustafson Y.
        Predicting falls in residential care by a risk assessment tool, staff judgement, and history of falls.
        Aging Clin Exp Res. 2003; 15: 51-59
        • Bentzen H.
        • Bergland A.
        • Forsen L.
        Diagnostic accuracy of three types of fall risk methods for predicting falls in nursing homes.
        Aging Clin Exp Res. 2011; 23: 187-195
        • Wilding M.J.
        • Seegert L.
        • Rupcic S.
        • et al.
        Falling short: Recruiting elderly individuals for a fall study.
        Ageing Res Rev. 2013; 12: 552-560
        • Muir S.W.
        • Gopaul K.
        • Montero Odasso M.M.
        The role of cognitive impairment in fall risk among older adults: A systematic review and meta-analysis.
        Age Ageing. 2012; 41: 299-308
        • Myers H.
        • Nikoletti S.
        Fall risk assessment: A prospective investigation of nurses' clinical judgement and risk assessment tools in predicting patient falls.
        Int J Nurs Pract. 2003; 9: 158-165
        • Comondore V.R.
        • Devereaux P.J.
        • Zhou Q.
        • et al.
        Quality of care in for-profit and not-for-profit nursing homes: Systematic review and meta-analysis.
        BMJ. 2009; 339: b2732
        • Cardinal L.
        Diagnostic testing in the context of high-value care: Incorporating prior probability.
        J Community Hosp Intern Med Perspect. 2016; 6: 33674
      3. Silver Paper on Falls Prevention in Older Age: Executive summary.
        (Available at:) (Accessed November 11, 2019)

      Related Podcast

      February 8, 2021

      February 2021 Issue: COVID-19 in Nursing Homes / Palliative Care / Driving Safety / Identifying Falls Risk

      Featuring Dr. Philip Sloane, Dr. Mallory Brown; Recorded on February 15, 2021.

      Loading ...