The pandemic of coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) has had a serious impact worldwide. Abnormal situations such as the fear of being infected with severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2), restrictions on going outdoors, abundant financial losses, fewer opportunities of communicating with close friends, and conflicting messages from authorities could cause anxiety or depression moods in all ages.
1
,2
Older people infected with COVID-19 have been reported to be at an increased risk of death and exacerbations, thereby requiring mechanical ventilation and extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO). Herewith, older people are more anxious and frightened of COVID-19 than young adults. A study reported that social isolation and loneliness during the COVID-19 pandemic could worsen older adults' anxiety and depressionCenters for Disease Control and Prevention
Coping with stress.
Coping with stress.
https://www.cdc.gov/coronavirus/2019-ncov/daily-life-coping/managing-stress-anxiety.html
Date accessed: October 21, 2020
3
; however, differences in older adults' mental health prior to and during the COVID-19 pandemic have not been thoroughly studied yet. Therefore, this study investigated the effects of the COVID-19 pandemic on older adults' mental status.A preliminary analysis for our questionnaire survey named Toyoyama town complex intervention project promoting “Exercise,” “Nutrition improvement,” and “Going out” (TENG project) was conducted. In this study, the physical, mental, and social status of community-dwelling older adults were examined every 6 months starting from October 2018. The study protocol was approved by the local ethics committee (approval no. 2018-0221) and written informed consent was obtained from all participants. The present analysis included the responders in December 2019 and July 2020. Depression and apathy during the first wave of COVID-19 pandemic were examined using the 15-item Geriatric Depression Scale (GDS-15) and apathy scale in the questionnaire.
4
,5
The score ranges of the GDS-15 and apathy scale were respectively 0 to 15 points and 0 to 42 points, with higher scores indicating more severe symptoms. Baseline characteristics used in the study included age, sex, comorbidities, living conditions, economic, and frailty status. Economic status was graded as follows: good economic status with no anxiety, fair economic status with minor anxiety, poor economic status with some anxiety, and severe economic status with anxiety, whereas the frailty status was graded using the Kihon checklist, having 0 to 3 points for robust, 4 to 7 points for prefrail, and 8 or more points for frail. The changes in the GDS-15 and apathy scale between December 2019 and July 2020 were assessed using generalized estimation equations that were adjusted with the above-mentioned baseline characteristics. Two subgroups, including individuals who are aged <75 years and who are aged ≥75 years were analyzed using the same methods. Two-sided P <.05 was set as significant, and all analyses were conducted using the R software (version 3.6.1, R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna, Austria).Overall, 519 participants with valid responses were analyzed. Age at baseline was 74.8 ± 5.3 years, and 259 participants (49.9%) were male. Among them, 149 (28.7%) were prefrail and 68 (13.1%) were frail. Depression and apathy scores both significantly deteriorated in July 2020 compared with December 2019. Depression score values increased from a GDS-15 score of 2.94 ± 3.27 to 3.62 ± 3.41 with an estimated change of 0.21 (95% confidence interval 0.12-0.31). Apathy scores also escalated from 13.65 ± 6.70 to 15.20 ± 6.98 with an estimated change of 0.11 (95% confidence interval 0.06-0.15) (Table 1). In subgroup analyses, both the GDS-15 score and apathy scale were significantly increased in those aged <75 years, whereas those aged ≥75 years showed significant change only in the GDS-15 score.
Table 1Mental Health Changes Between Before and During the COVID-19 Pandemic
December 2019 | July 2020 | Raw Score Change | Estimated Change (95% CI) | P Value | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Overall (n=519) | |||||
GDS-15 | 2.94 ± 3.27 | 3.62 ± 3.41 | 0.72 ± 3.45 | 0.214 (0.117-0.311) | <.001 |
Apathy Scale | 13.65 ± 6.70 | 15.20 ± 6.98 | 1.63 ± 6.88 | 0.106 (0.061-0.150) | <.001 |
Aged <75 y (n=246) | |||||
GDS-15 | 2.46 ± 3.06 | 3.34 ± 3.25 | 0.87 ± 3.31 | 0.300 (0.152-0.447) | <.001 |
Apathy Scale | 12.94 ± 6.34 | 14.97 ± 7.21 | 2.17 ± 6.28 | 0.156 (0.098-0.215) | <.001 |
Aged ≥75 y (n=273) | |||||
GDS-15 | 3.38 ± 3.39 | 3.87 ± 3.54 | 0.57 ± 3.57 | 0.144 (0.016-0.272) | .027 |
Apathy Scale | 14.29 ± 6.97 | 15.42 ± 6.76 | 1.12 ± 7.38 | 0.061 (−0.004-0.126) | .067 |
CI, confidence interval.
Data are shown in mean ± standard deviation or estimated value (95% CI). Estimated changes and 95% CIs are calculated with generalized estimating equations. Models are adjusted for sex, comorbidities, living conditions, economic status, and frailty status.
The results showed that the COVID-19 pandemic had worsened depressive mood and apathy among the community-dwelling older adults. The results were remarkable especially in adults aged <75 years. Yamada et al reported the results of an online-based survey revealing that daily physical activity among community-dwelling older adults has decreased during the COVID-19 pandemic.
6
Higher physical activity is important in maintaining mental health7
; however, those who were less fit were found to have little deterioration in mood, despite a reduction in their physical activity. Individuals aged ≥75 years might be less affected by COVID-19 because their baseline physical activity was lesser than that of individuals aged <75 years. Additionally, this study suggests that adults aged <75 years, who are usually considered to be relatively robust, are at high risk for worsened depressive mood and apathy. Pfefferbaum et al1
noted that mental abnormalities in this situation may have continuous effects like post-traumatic stress disorder and suggested the risk of the current lack of mental health screening systems. Therefore, it is warranted to establish a system that could promptly screen and support the mental health of older adults and other mentally vulnerable populations.Acknowledgments
We thank Taeko Nagatomo, Sae Oozeki, and other Toyoyama town officials for helping with data preparation and Tomomi Morita for helping with data cleaning.
References
- Mental health and the Covid-19 pandemic.N Engl J Med. 2020; 383: 510-512
- Coping with stress.(Available at:)https://www.cdc.gov/coronavirus/2019-ncov/daily-life-coping/managing-stress-anxiety.htmlDate accessed: October 21, 2020
- Social isolation and loneliness among San Francisco Bay area older adults during the COVID-19 shelter-in-place orders.J Am Geriatr Soc. 2020 Sep 23; (10.1111/jgs.16865. [Epub ahead of print].)
- Short versions of the geriatric depression scale: A study of their validity for the diagnosis of a major depressive episode according to ICD-10 and DSM-IV.Int J Geriatr Psychiatry. 1999; 14: 858-865
- Reliability, validity, and clinical correlates of apathy in Parkinson's disease.J Neuropsychiatry Clin Neurosci. 1992; 4: 134-139
- Effect of the COVID-19 epidemic on physical activity in community-dwelling older adults in Japan: A cross-sectional online survey.J Nutr Health Aging. 2020; 24: 948-950
- Assessment of bidirectional relationships between physical activity and depression among adults: A 2-sample mendelian randomization study.JAMA Psychiatry. 2019; 76: 399-408
Article info
Publication history
Published online: November 24, 2020
Footnotes
The authors declare no conflicts of interest.
This work was supported by the Center of Innovation (COI) program of Japan Science and Technology (JST) Agency (grant number JPMJCE1317).
Identification
Copyright
© 2020 Published by Elsevier Inc. on behalf of AMDA - The Society for Post-Acute and Long-Term Care Medicine.