Abstract
Objectives
The “timed up and go” (TUG) test is a simple and widely used test of overall functional
mobility. There is a paucity of TUG normative data among Asian individuals who differ
in habitual gait speed and fall risk from Western population. The objectives of this
study were to determine TUG reference values and optimum cutoffs predicting prevalent
and incident disability for community-dwelling adults.
Design
One cross-sectional (Study 1–Yishun Study) and one longitudinal (Study 2–Singapore
Longitudinal Aging Study) study in Singapore.
Setting and Participants
Study 1 comprised 538 nondisabled, community-dwelling adults aged between 21 and 90 years.
Study 2 comprised 1356 community-dwelling older adults aged ≥55 years followed for
3 years.
Methods
Study 1 collected TUG reference values and assessed physiological fall risk (PFR)
using the Physiological Profile Assessment (PPA). Study 2 assessed association of
TUG with disability with the Barthel Index and the Lawton scale at baseline and follow-up.
Results
From Study 1, mean TUG time for individuals aged 60 to 74 years was 9.80 seconds,
shorter than values reported for Westerners of 12.30 seconds. It was significantly
associated with high PFR [odds ratio (OR) 1.14, 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.03–1.27],
74.0% agreement, Cohen's kappa = 0.314 (95% CI 0.238–0.390); area under the curve = 0.85
(95% CI 0.80–0.90). A TUG cutoff of 10.2 seconds discriminated high PFR from low PFR
with 84.4% sensitivity and 72.6% specificity. In Study 2, the threshold for observing
significantly increased risk of disability was ≥9.45 seconds for prevalent disability
(OR 2.98, 95% CI 1.41–6.78), functional decline (OR 2.68, 95% CI 1.33–5.80), and incidental
disability (OR 2.25, 95% CI 1.08–4.97).
Conclusions and Implications
TUG reference values and cutoff predicting disability for community-dwelling older
adults in Singapore are consistent with Asian data and lower than for Western individuals.
TUG could be used to guide development and evaluation of risk screening of adverse
health outcomes across the life span in Singapore.
Keywords
To read this article in full you will need to make a payment
Purchase one-time access:
Academic & Personal: 24 hour online accessCorporate R&D Professionals: 24 hour online accessOne-time access price info
- For academic or personal research use, select 'Academic and Personal'
- For corporate R&D use, select 'Corporate R&D Professionals'
Subscribe:
Subscribe to Journal of the American Medical Directors AssociationAlready a print subscriber? Claim online access
Already an online subscriber? Sign in
Register: Create an account
Institutional Access: Sign in to ScienceDirect
References
- Reference values for the timed up and go test: A descriptive meta-analysis.J Geriatr Phys Ther. 2006; 29: 64-68
- The timed “Up & Go”: A test of basic functional mobility for frail elderly persons.J Am Geriatr Soc. 1991; 39: 142-148
- Balance in elderly patients: The “get-up and go” test.Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 1986; 67: 387-389
- Measurements of balance: Comparison of the timed “Up and Go” test and functional reach test with the Berg Balance Scale.J Phys Ther Sci. 2003; 15: 93-97
- Relationship between timed ‘up and go’ and gait time in an elderly orthopaedic rehabilitation population.Clin Rehabil. 2000; 14: 96-101
- Assessing walking ability in subjects with spinal cord injury: Validity and reliability of 3 walking tests.Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2005; 86: 190-196
- Predicting the probability for falls in community-dwelling older adults using the timed up and go test.Phys Ther. 2000; 80: 896-903
- Timed “up and go” test as a predictor of falls within 6 months after hip fracture surgery.Phys Ther. 2007; 87: 24-30
- A comparison of different balance tests in the prediction of falls in older women with vertebral fractures: A cohort study.Age Ageing. 2007; 36: 78-83
- Simulating the effects of a clinical guidelines screening algorithm for fall risk in community dwelling older adults.Aging Clin Exp Res. 2019; 31: 1069-1076
- Functional mobility discriminates nonfallers from one-time and frequent fallers.J. Gerontol A Biol Sci Med Sci. 2000; 55: M672-M676
- Streamlining assessment and intervention in a falls clinic using the Timed Up and Go Test and Physiological Profile Assessments.Age Ageing. 2005; 34: 567-571
- Performance measures predict onset of activity of daily living difficulty in community-dwelling older adults.J Am Geriatr Soc. 2010; 58: 844-852
- Predictive cutoff values of the five-times sit-to-stand test and the timed "up & go" test for disability incidence in older people dwelling in the community.Phys Ther. 2017; 97: 417-424
- Performance measures predict onset of activity of daily living difficulty in community-dwelling older adults.J Am Geriatr Soc. 2010; 58: 844-852
- Alternative items for identifying hierarchical levels of physical disability by using physical performance tests in women aged 75 years and older.Geriatr Gerontol Int. 2010; 10: 302-310
- Using timed up and go and usual gait speed to predict incident disability in daily activities among community-dwelling adults aged 65 and older.Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2014; 95: 1954-1961
- Reference values for the Timed Up and Go test in healthy Japanese elderly people: Determination using the methodology of meta-analysis.Geriatr Gerontol Int. 2011; 11: 445-451
- Establishing the reference value for “timed up-and-go” test in healthy adults of Gujarat, India.J Educ Health Promot. 2018; 7: 62
- Timed up and go reference values for older adults with and without noncommunicable diseases and arthritis.Osteoarthr Cartil. 2020; 28: S361-S362
- Normative data and determinants for the timed “up and go” test in a population-based sample of elderly individuals without gait disturbances.J Geriatr Phys Ther. 2008; 3: 57-63
- Age-and gender-related test performance in community-dwelling elderly people: Six-Minute Walk Test, Berg Balance Scale, Timed Up & Go Test, and gait speeds.Phys Ther. 2002; 82: 128-137
- Validity of 3 physical performance measures in inpatient geriatric rehabilitation.Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2006; 87: 105-110
- Age related timed up and go test values and its analysis among elderly Kanchipuram District population.J Clin Diagn Res. 2018; 12: 5-7
- Timed Up and Go (TUG) test: Normative reference values for ages 20 to 59 years and relationships with physical and mental health risk factors.J Prim Care Community Health. 2017; 8: 9-13
- Sensorimotor performance and reference values for falls risk assessment in community-dwelling Singaporean adults – the Yishun Study.Phys Ther. 2021; ([Epub ahead of print])https://doi.org/10.1093/ptj/pzab035
- Comparison of performance-based measures among native Japanese, Japanese-Americans in Hawaii and Caucasian women in the United States, ages 65 years and over: A cross-sectional study.BMC Geriatr. 2001; 1: 1-7
- Falls among community-dwelling elderly in Japan.J Bone Miner Res. 1998; 13: 1468-1474
- Panel on Prevention of Falls in Older Persons American Geriatrics Society, British Geriatrics Society. Summary of the updated American Geriatrics Society/British Geriatrics Society clinical practice guideline for prevention of falls in older persons.J Am Geriatr Soc. 2011; 59: 148-157
- Prevalence and associated factors of sarcopenia in Singaporean adults–the Yishun Study.J Am Med Dir Assoc. 2021; 22: 885.e1-885.e10
- Cognitive frailty and adverse health outcomes: Findings from the Singapore Longitudinal Ageing Studies (SLAS).J Am Med Dir Assoc. 2017; 18: 252-258
- A physiological profile approach to falls risk assessment and prevention.Phys Ther. 2003; 83: 237-252
- Functional evaluation: The Barthel Index: A simple index of independence useful in scoring improvement in the rehabilitation of the chronically ill.Md State Med J. 1965; 14: 61-65
- Assessment of older people: Self-maintaining and instrumental activities of daily living.Gerontologist. 1969; 9: 179-186
- “Mini-mental state”: A practical method for grading the cognitive state of patients for the clinician.J Psychiatr Res. 1975; 12: 189-198
- Geriatric depression scale.Psychopharmacol Bull. 1988; 24: 709-711
- Strength and muscle mass loss with aging process. Age and strength loss.Muscles Ligaments Tendons J. 2013; 3: 346-350
- Change in physical performance over time in older women: The Women's Health and Aging Study.J Gerontol A Biol Sci Med Sci. 2002; 57: M289-M293
- Longitudinal change in the physical performance of older adults in the community.J Jpn Phys Ther Assoc. 1998; 1: 1-5
- Age-related changes in balance performance.Disabil Rehabil. 1994; 16: 58-62
- Stride-dependent changes in gait of older people.J Neurol. 1991; 238: 1-5
- Functional performance in community living older adults.J Geriatr Phys Ther. 2003; 26: 14-22
- Timed Up and Go test and risk of falls in older adults: A systematic review.J Nutr Health Aging. 2011; 15: 933-938
- The effect of assistive devices on the performance of community dwelling elderly on the timed up and go test.Issues on Aging. 1997; 20: 3-8
Article info
Publication history
Published online: April 02, 2021
Footnotes
P. L. C. and N. X. T. contributed equally to this work.
The authors declare no conflicts of interest.
This research was supported as part of a core funding from the Ministry of Health of Singapore, Singapore to GERI.
Identification
Copyright
© 2021 AMDA - The Society for Post-Acute and Long-Term Care Medicine.