Advertisement

Predictors of Frailty Change in Home and Community-Based Services Populations

Published:August 19, 2021DOI:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jamda.2021.07.032

      Abstract

      Objectives

      With unprecedented demand for Medicaid long-term services and supports, states are seeking to allocate resources in the most efficient way. Understanding the prevalence of frailty and how it varies across home and community-based services (HCBS) populations can assist states with more precise identification of individuals most in need of services. Early identification of individuals more likely to experience frailty changes could allow for enhanced care planning to prevent or slow the progression of decline.

      Design

      Longitudinal study.

      Setting and Participants

      Data from Connecticut’s assessment tool (based on interRAI-HC) were analyzed at 2 time points for 16,309 individuals receiving HCBS. The sample included assessments completed between November 1, 2017 and July 15, 2020 across 4 groups: older adults 65+ years old meeting nursing facility level of care (NF LOC), older adults 65+ years old not meeting NF LOC, individuals with acquired brain injury, and individuals <65 years old with physical disability.

      Methods

      We measured frailty using the Frailty Index (FI) and examined change in FI between baseline and follow-up. A change in FI score of at least ±0.03 was classified as a clinically meaningful change. We compared predictors of clinically meaningful decline or improvement using multivariate logistic regression.

      Results

      In our sample, 54% of individuals experienced a clinically meaningful change: 42% declined and 12% improved. Individuals receiving in-home care services had lower odds of improvement across all HCBS groups and multiple frailty categories with odds ratios ranging from 0.35 to 0.68. Frail older adults 65+ years old meeting nursing facility level of care receiving physical therapy were 21% less likely to experience decline and 1.4 times more likely to improve.

      Conclusions and Implications

      The nature of HCBS support provided can impact changes in frailty status. More reactive services such as in-home care may contribute to frailty decline while rehabilitative services such as physical therapy may protect against decline.

      Keywords

      To read this article in full you will need to make a payment

      Purchase one-time access:

      Academic & Personal: 24 hour online accessCorporate R&D Professionals: 24 hour online access
      One-time access price info
      • For academic or personal research use, select 'Academic and Personal'
      • For corporate R&D use, select 'Corporate R&D Professionals'

      Subscribe:

      Subscribe to Journal of the American Medical Directors Association
      Already a print subscriber? Claim online access
      Already an online subscriber? Sign in
      Institutional Access: Sign in to ScienceDirect

      References

        • Thach N.T.
        • Wiener J.M.
        An Overview of Long-Term Services and Supports and Medicaid: Final Report; 2018.
        (Available at:)
        • Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services
        Long-Term Services and Supports Rebalancing Tooklit; 2020.
        (Available at:)
        • Danilovich M.K.
        • Diaz L.
        • Johnson C.
        • et al.
        Evaluating frailty in Medicaid Home and Community-based Services clients: A feasibility and comparison study between the SHARE-FI and SPPB.
        Pilot Feasibility Stud. 2019; 5: 1-6
        • Armstrong J.J.
        • Stolee P.
        • Hirdes J.P.
        • Poss J.W.
        Examining three frailty conceptualizations in their ability to predict negative outcomes for home-care clients.
        Age Ageing. 2010; 39: 755-758
        • McKenzie K.
        • Ouellette-Kuntz H.
        • Martin L.
        Using an accumulation of deficits approach to measure frailty in a population of home care users with intellectual and developmental disabilities: An analytical descriptive study Public health, nutrition and epidemiology.
        BMC Geriatr. 2015; 15: 1-13
        • Ludwig C.
        • Busnel C.
        Derivation of a Frailty Index from the interRAI-HC to Assess Frailty among Older Adults Receiving Home Care and Assistance (the “fraXity” Study).
        Adv Geriatr Med Res. Published online. 2020;
        • Hubbard R.E.
        • Peel N.M.
        • Samanta M.
        • et al.
        Frailty status at admission to hospital predicts multiple adverse outcomes.
        Age Ageing. 2017; 46: 801-806
        • Kojima G.
        Frailty as a predictor of future falls among community-dwelling older people: A systematic review and meta-analysis.
        J Am Med Dir Assoc. 2015; 16: 1027-1033
        • Kojima G.
        Frailty as a predictor of hospitalisation among community-dwelling older people: A systematic review and meta-analysis.
        J Epidemiol Community Health. 2016; 70: 722-729
        • Kojima G.
        Frailty as a predictor of nursing home placement among community-dwelling older adults: A systematic review and meta-analysis.
        J Geriatr Phys Ther. 2018; 41: 42-48
        • Xue Q.L.
        The frailty syndrome: Definition and natural history.
        Clin Geriatr Med. 2011; 27: 1-15
        • Gill T.M.
        • Gahbauer E.A.
        • Allore H.G.
        • Han L.
        Transitions between frailty states among community-living older persons.
        Arch Intern Med. 2006; 166: 418-423
        • Murray S.
        • Tourtellotte A.
        Medicaid Long Term Services and Supports Annual Expenditures Report: FY2017 and 2018. Published online 2021.
        (Available at:)
        • Friedman E.M.
        • Shih R.A.
        • Ahluwalia S.C.
        • et al.
        Factors explaining state differences in applying for a recent long-term care program that promotes aging in place: perspectives of medicaid administrators.
        J Appl Gerontol. 2021; 40: 972-979
        • Foebel A.D.
        • Van Hout H.P.
        • Van Der Roest H.G.
        • et al.
        Quality of care in European home care programs using the second generation interRAI Home Care Quality Indicators (HCQIs).
        BMC Geriatr. 2015; 15: 148
        • interRAI
        A total of 24 US states are using interRAI instruments. Published 2021.
        (Available at)
        • Rockwood K.
        • Mitnitski A.
        Frailty in relation to the accumulation of deficits.
        J Gerontol Ser A Biol Sci Med Sci. 2007; 62: 722-727
        • Hubbard R.E.
        • Peel N.M.
        • Samanta M.
        • et al.
        Derivation of a frailty index from the interRAI acute care instrument.
        BMC Geriatr. 2015; 15: 27
        • Campitelli M.A.
        • Bronskill S.E.
        • Hogan D.B.
        • et al.
        The prevalence and health consequences of frailty in a population-based older home care cohort: A comparison of different measures.
        BMC Geriatr. 2016; 16
        • Cesari M.
        • Gambassi G.
        • Van Kan G.A.
        • Vellas B.
        The frailty phenotype and the frailty index: Different instruments for different purposes.
        Age Ageing. 2014; 43: 10-12
        • Jang I.Y.
        • Jung H.W.
        • Lee H.Y.
        • et al.
        Evaluation of clinically meaningful changes in measures of frailty.
        J Gerontol A Biol Sci Med Sci. 2020; 75: 1143-1147
        • Theou O.
        • van der Valk A.M.
        • Godin J.
        • et al.
        Exploring clinically meaningful changes for the frailty index in a longitudinal cohort of hospitalized older patients.
        J Gerontol Ser A Biol Sci Med Sci. 2020; 75: 1928-1934
        • Larsen R.T.
        • Turcotte L.A.
        • Westendorp R.
        • et al.
        Frailty index status of Canadian home care clients improves with exercise therapy and declines in the presence of polypharmacy.
        J Am Med Dir Assoc. 2020; 21: 766-771.e1
        • Ding Y.Y.
        • Kuha J.
        • Murphy M.
        Multidimensional predictors of physical frailty in older people: Identifying how and for whom they exert their effects.
        Biogerontology. 2017; 18: 237-252
        • Ye B.
        • Chen H.
        • Huang L.
        • et al.
        Changes in frailty among community-dwelling Chinese older adults and its predictors: Evidence from a two-year longitudinal study.
        BMC Geriatr. 2020; 20: 130
        • Pollack L.R.
        • Litwack-Harrison S.
        • Cawthon P.M.
        • et al.
        Patterns and predictors of frailty transitions in older men: the osteoporotic fractures in men Study.
        J Am Geriatr Soc. 2017; 65: 2473-2479
        • Niederstrasser N.G.
        • Rogers N.T.
        • Bandelow S.
        Determinants of frailty development and progression using a multidimensional frailty index: Evidence from the english longitudinal study of ageing.
        PLoS One. 2019; 14: e0223799
        • Morris J.N.
        • Berg K.
        • Howard E.P.
        • et al.
        Functional recovery within a formal home care program.
        J Am Med Dir Assoc. 2019; 20: 1001-1006
        • Lee J.S.W.
        • Auyeung T.W.
        • Leung J.
        • et al.
        Transitions in frailty states among community-living older adults and their associated factors.
        J Am Med Dir Assoc. 2014; 15: 281-286
        • Usher T.
        • Buta B.
        • Thorpe R.J.
        • et al.
        Dissecting the racial/ethnic disparity in frailty in a nationally representative cohort study with respect to health, income, and measurement.
        J Gerontol A Biol Sci Med Sci. 2021; 76: 69-76
        • Fabius C.D.
        • Thomas K.S.
        • Zhang T.
        • et al.
        Racial disparities in Medicaid home and community-based service utilization and expenditures among persons with multiple sclerosis 11 Medical and Health Sciences 1117 Public Health and Health Services.
        BMC Health Serv Res. 2018; 18: 773
        • Fortinsky R.H.
        • Gitlin L.N.
        • Pizzi L.T.
        • et al.
        Translation of the Care of Persons with Dementia in their Environments (COPE) intervention in a publicly-funded home care context: Rationale and research design.
        Contemp Clin Trials. 2016; 49: 155-165
        • Liu C.K.
        • Fielding R.A.
        Exercise as an intervention for frailty.
        Clin Geriatr Med. 2011; 27: 101-110
        • Imamura H.
        • Uchiyama E.
        • Akiyama M.
        • et al.
        Erratum: Relationship of living arrangement with the decline in functional capacity in elderly people by gender: A longitudinal observational study (Environ Health Prev Med (2020;25:15).
        Environ Health Prev Med. 2020; 25: 1-12
        • Gale C.R.
        • Westbury L.
        • Cooper C.
        Social isolation and loneliness as risk factors for the progression of frailty: The English Longitudinal Study of Ageing.
        Age Ageing. 2018; 47: 392-397
        • Sakurai R.
        • Kawai H.
        • Suzuki H.
        • et al.
        Poor social network, not living alone, is associated with incidence of adverse health outcomes in older adults.
        J Am Med Dir Assoc. 2019; 20: 1438-1443