Advertisement

Decision Aid Interventions for Family Caregivers of Persons With Advanced Dementia in Decision-Making About Feeding Options: A Scoping Review

Published:September 20, 2022DOI:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jamda.2022.08.014

      Abstract

      Objectives

      We provided an overview of the literature on decision aid interventions for family caregivers of older adults with advanced dementia regarding decision making about tube feeding. We synthesized (1) the use of theory during the development, implementation, and evaluation of decision aids; (2) the development, content, and delivery of decision aid interventions; (3) caregivers’ experience with decision aid interventions; and (4) the effect of decision aid interventions on caregivers’ quality of decision-making about feeding options.

      Design

      Scoping review.

      Methods

      We conducted a scoping review of peer-reviewed studies published January 1, 2000–June 30, 2022, in MEDLINE, EMBASE, The Cochrane Library, CINAHL, and Web of Science databases. The process was guided by Arksey and O’Malley’s methodological framework, which includes identifying the research question, choosing related studies, charting the data, and summarizing results. Empirical articles concerning the decision aid interventions about feeding options were selected.

      Results

      Six publications reporting 4 unique decision aid interventions were included. All the interventions targeted caregivers of older adults with advanced dementia. Three decision aids were culturally adapted from existing decision aids. The Ottawa Decision Support Framework and the International Patient Decision Aid Standards Framework were used in these 6 publications. Interventions aimed to improve decision making regarding tube feeding for caregivers through static delivery methods. Caregivers rated these decision aids as helpful and acceptable. Decisional conflict and knowledge of feeding options were the most common outcomes evaluated. Reduction in decisional conflict and increase in knowledge were consistently found among dementia caregivers, but no intervention effects were found on preferences for the use of tube feeding.

      Conclusions and Implications

      Decision aid interventions effectively improve decision-making regarding tube feeding among the target population. Cultural adaptation of an existing decision aid intervention is the main strategy. However, the lack of guidance of a cultural adaptation framework in this process may lead to difficulties explaining caregivers’ behavioral changes. Moreover, merely providing information is not enough to change caregivers’ preferences or behavior of use of tube feeding. A systematic approach to cultural adaptation and interactive intervention is needed in future studies.

      Keywords

      To read this article in full you will need to make a payment

      Purchase one-time access:

      Academic & Personal: 24 hour online accessCorporate R&D Professionals: 24 hour online access
      One-time access price info
      • For academic or personal research use, select 'Academic and Personal'
      • For corporate R&D use, select 'Corporate R&D Professionals'

      Subscribe:

      Subscribe to Journal of the American Medical Directors Association
      Already a print subscriber? Claim online access
      Already an online subscriber? Sign in
      Institutional Access: Sign in to ScienceDirect

      References

        • Mitchell S.L.
        Advanced dementia.
        N Engl J Med. 2015; 372: 2533-2540
        • Mitchell S.L.
        • Teno J.M.
        • Kiely D.K.
        • et al.
        The clinical course of advanced dementia.
        N Engl J Med. 2009; 361: 1529-1538
        • Gillick M.R.
        Rethinking the role of tube feeding in patients with advanced dementia.
        N Engl J Med. 2000; 342: 206-210
        • Teno J.M.
        • Gozalo P.L.
        • Mitchell S.L.
        • et al.
        Does feeding tube insertion and its timing improve survival?.
        J Am Geriatr Soc. 2012; 60: 1918-1921
        • Lee Y.F.
        • Hsu T.W.
        • Liang C.S.
        • et al.
        The efficacy and safety of tube feeding in advanced dementia patients: a systemic review and meta-analysis study.
        J Am Med Dir Assoc. 2021; 22: 357-363
        • American Geriatrics Society Ethics Committee and Clinical Practice and Models of Care Committee
        American Geriatrics Society feeding tubes in advanced dementia position statement.
        J Am Geriatr Soc. 2014; 62: 1590-1593
        • Davies N.
        • Barrado-Martin Y.
        • Vickerstaff V.
        • et al.
        Enteral tube feeding for people with severe dementia.
        Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2021; 8: CD013503
        • Teno J.M.
        • Mitchell S.L.
        • Kuo S.K.
        • et al.
        Decision-making and outcomes of feeding tube insertion: a five-state study.
        J Am Geriatr Soc. 2011; 59: 881-886
        • Stacey D.
        • Légaré F.
        • Lewis K.
        • et al.
        Decision aids for people facing health treatment or screening decisions.
        Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2017; 4: CD001431
        • Holmes-Rovner M.
        International Patient Decision Aid Standards (IPDAS): beyond decision aids to usual design of patient education materials.
        Health Expect. 2007; 10: 103-107
        • Hanson L.C.
        • Carey T.S.
        • Caprio A.J.
        • et al.
        Improving decision-making for feeding options in advanced dementia: a randomized, controlled trial.
        J Am Geriatr Soc. 2011; 59: 2009-2016
        • Pham M.T.
        • Rajić A.
        • Greig J.D.
        • Sargeant J.M.
        • Papadopoulos A.
        • McEwen S.A.
        A scoping review of scoping reviews: advancing the approach and enhancing the consistency.
        Res Synth Methods. 2014; 5: 371-385
        • Arksey H.
        • O'Malley L.
        Scoping studies: towards a methodological framework.
        Int J Soc Res Method. 2005; 8: 19-32
        • Tricco A.C.
        • Lillie E.
        • Zarin W.
        • et al.
        PRISMA extension for scoping reviews (PRISMA-ScR): checklist and explanation.
        Ann Intern Med. 2018; 169: 467-473
        • Peters M.D.
        • Godfrey C.M.
        • Khalil H.
        • McInerney P.
        • Parker D.
        • Soares C.B.
        Guidance for conducting systematic scoping reviews.
        Int J Evid Based Healthc. 2015; 13: 141-146
        • Khan K.S.
        • Ter Riet G.
        • Glanville J.
        • Sowden A.J.
        • Kleijnen J.
        Undertaking Systematic Reviews of Research on Effectiveness: CRD's Guidance for Carrying Out or Commissioning Reviews.
        NHS Centre for Reviews and Dissemination, 2001
        • Anderson S.
        • Allen P.
        • Peckham S.
        • Goodwin N.
        Asking the right questions: scoping studies in the commissioning of research on the organisation and delivery of health services.
        Health Res Policy Syst. 2008; 6: 7
        • Derech R.D.A.
        • Neves F.S.
        Cross-cultural adaptation and content validity of the patient decision aid “Making Choices: Feeding Options for Patients with Dementia” to Brazilian Portuguese language.
        Codas. 2021; 33 (Article in Portuguese, English): e20200044
        • Ersek M.
        • Sefcik J.S.
        • Lin F.C.
        • Lee T.J.
        • Gilliam R.
        • Hanson L.C.
        Provider staffing effect on a decision aid intervention.
        Clin Nurs Res. 2014; 23: 36-53
        • Kuraoka Y.
        • Nakayama K.
        A decision aid regarding long-term tube feeding targeting substitute decision makers for cognitively impaired older persons in Japan: a small-scale before-and-after study.
        BMC Geriatr. 2014; 14: 16
        • Mitchell S.
        • Tetroe J.
        • O'Connor A.
        A decision aid for long-term tube feeding in cognitively impaired older persons.
        J Am Geriatr Soc. 2001; 49: 313-316
        • Snyder E.A.
        • Caprio A.J.
        • Wessell K.
        • Lin F.C.
        • Hanson L.C.
        Impact of a decision aid on surrogate decision-makers' perceptions of feeding options for patients with dementia.
        J Am Med Dir Assoc. 2013; 14: 114-118
        • O'Connor A.M.
        • Tugwell P.
        • Wells G.A.
        • et al.
        A decision aid for women considering hormone therapy after menopause: decision support framework and evaluation.
        Patient Educ Couns. 1998; 33: 267-279
        • O'Connor A.M.
        Validation of a decisional conflict scale.
        Med Decis Making. 1995; 15: 25-30
        • Elwyn G.
        • O'Connor A.
        • Stacey D.
        • et al.
        Developing a quality criteria framework for patient decision aids: online international Delphi consensus process.
        BMJ. 2006; 333: 417
        • Hanson L.C.
        • Gilliam R.
        • Lee T.J.
        Successful clinical trial research in nursing homes: the improving decision-making study.
        Clin Trials. 2010; 7: 735-743
        • Chenel V.
        • Mortenson W.B.
        • Guay M.
        • Jutai J.W.
        • Auger C.
        Cultural adaptation and validation of patient decision aids: a scoping review.
        Patient Prefer Adherence. 2018; 12: 321-332
        • Rodriguez M.M.D.
        • Baumann A.A.
        • Schwartz A.L.
        Cultural adaptation of an evidence based intervention: From theory to practice in a Latino/a community context.
        Am J Community Psychol. 2011; 47: 170-186
        • Matthews A.K.
        • Steffen A.D.
        • Kuhns L.M.
        • et al.
        Evaluation of a randomized clinical trial comparing the effectiveness of a culturally targeted and nontargeted smoking cessation intervention for lesbian, gay, bisexual, and transgender smokers.
        Nicotine Tob Res. 2019; 21: 1506-1516
        • Lagisetty P.A.
        • Priyadarshini S.
        • Terrell S.
        • et al.
        Culturally targeted strategies for diabetes prevention in minority population: a systematic review and framework.
        Diabetes Educ. 2017; 43: 54-77
        • Xie B.
        • Berkley A.S.
        • Kwak J.
        • Fleischmann K.R.
        • Champion J.D.
        • Koltai K.S.
        End-of-life decision making by family caregivers of persons with advanced dementia: a literature review of decision aids.
        SAGE Open Med. 2018; 6 (2050312118777517)
        • Fried T.R.
        • Leung S.L.
        • Blakley L.A.
        • Martino S.
        Development and pilot testing of a motivational interview for engagement in advance care planning.
        J Palliat Med. 2018; 21: 897-898
        • Catic A.G.
        • Berg A.I.
        • Moran J.A.
        • et al.
        Preliminary data from an advanced dementia consult service: integrating research, education, and clinical expertise.
        J Am Geriatr Soc. 2013; 61: 2008-2012
        • Davies N.
        • Sampson E.L.
        • West E.
        • et al.
        A decision aid to support family carers of people living with dementia towards the end-of-life: coproduction process, outcome and reflections.
        Health Expect. 2021; 24: 1677-1691